Defendant

Procedural History: Schwartz, the defendant, was charged and convicted with three counts of computer crime under ORS 164.377 before a jury. ORS 164.377 is defined by three separate crimes. See Rule of Law. The defendant had argued that State attempted to prove that he violated ORS 164.377(2)(c). The parties argued that whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that the defendant's actions were for the purpose of committing theft. The defendant also argued that he couldn't have “taken” the…

the action against defendants Penske Truck Leasing and Santos Dlaz-Roman who the action are brought. The case talked about a motor vehicle accident happened in New York State. The plaintiff who claimed that she suffered serious and permanent injuries from the accident brought a lawsuit to the defendants. However, the defendant Penske dismissed the plaintiff’s claim because the defendant deemed plaintiff’s claims against the federal law provided under 49 U.S.C.A. 30106. The defendant Penske also…

Thomas Marks by defendant number 2 lawyer using the virtue approach I was able to conclude whether or not the plea bargain should be accepted. The proper way to apply the virtue theory is to ask yourself a set of questions that will help guide you on what's the right decision, especially when it comes to ethical dilemmas. Is Mark faced with an ethical dilemma? Mark is faced with the ethical dilemma of whether or not to accept the plea bargain that was offered to him by defendant two lawyer…

unjust convictions as well as to protect the individual’s rights. Every defendant is entitled to counsel. Counsel is automatically provided to those who are facing the death penalty, are illiterate, or don’t have enough money to pay for one themselves. The sixth amendment guarantees the right to waive assistance of counsel and conduct one's own defense. In order to do so the judge over the case must first; make sure the defendant is competent to stand trial, advised of their rights, and warned…

Edwards. Marion advised he observed the defendant, later identified as John Szatkowski, select a pair of shoes and place the item onto his feet. Marion advised that the defendant discarded the shoes that he was wearing when he entered the business. Marion followed the defendant at which time he observed him consume a package of sushi and a bag of Mounds candy which the defendant discarded the empty packaging within the business. Marion also observed the defendant conceal a sandwich into his…

mental retardation or brain damage associated with the defendant leads to the incompetency to stand trial. Which shows the defendant lacks the ability to stand trial at the time. Whenever the defendant receives help then the judge can make sure they are ok to continue the case. Competency to stand trial is different from insanity defense when it comes down to the…

The defendant Lee Robinson is charged with manslaughter. As the defendants actions leading to the offence did not constitute acceptable behaviour and that the result ended up with a man loosing his life because of Mr. Lee Robinson actions the maximum penalty for manslaughter in the UK is a life sentence. Despite the severity of his crime in the criminal courts a defendant may be able to reduce their sentence by co-operating after the fact. In the Uk a life sentence is 20 years imprisonment…

state of California, and has raped and murdered 14 teenagers. He committed his 1st rape crime in 1972 and went on until 1980, the year he was arrested. He was sentenced to death and died of lethal injection in 1996. On August 5, 1979, the defendant and co-defendant Butts accosted Marcus Grabs, 17, in Newport Beach sometime between 6 and 10 p.m. Marcus, a German student on a backpacking tour of the United States, was sodomized, beaten and stabbed 77 times. His nude body was found the next day…

The established custodial environment is with Defendant Father. Plaintiff Mother recently had a relapse on heroine, which resulted in Minor Child placed in Defendant Father’s care. Plaintiff Mother voluntarily relinquished her physical custody of Minor Child temporarily. Currently, the Minor Child resides with the Defendant Father. The parties share joint custody of Minor Child. The Minor Child looks to Plaintiff Mother for guidance, discipline, necessities of life, and parental comfort. However…

seeking the truth or not. One of the primary principles currently in place that he believes should be amended is the “Silent Defendant” rule, as he calls it, which allows the defendant the choice of whether to testify or not, and their choice to not testify cannot cause negative inferences from the jury. He believes that allowing the defendant not to speak as well as…