Critical legal studies

Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and…

In this particular case, Bradley Smith sued Del Lago Partners, Inc. and Del Lago Partners, L.P., for the injuries he sustained when a fight broke out among customers at the Grandstand Bar, which is part of the respondents’ resort. Smith obtained both a skull fracture and brain damage. He sued De Lago on the premises-liability platform. After nine days of hotly disputed evidence, I would say both Smith and De Lago won on a 49-51 percent liability apportionment. Reducing Smith’s damages by the…

• P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that she, her sister Indira Alvarez (non-party) and other family members were involved in a brawl with Nairoby Cruz and Tanairy Cruz, sisters, (non-parties). P claims that Tanairy Cruz had early insulted Indira in a store. P claims that during the fight she was punched in the face, hit in the head and chest. P claims that during the fight an individual pushed her against the gate for approximately 5 minutes. P claims that during the fight Nairoby…

Hart-Fuller debate doesn’t just full on disagree with each other, but come to an understanding on certain aspects. A positivist (Hart in this debate) believes that morals and principles should not and do not coincide with law making and law decisions. Legal rights and moral rights are not interrelated, it’s just a sheer chance the two overlap. Hart considers the process of determining cases through reason or assumption…

this is a matter involving Kenneth Taheny against Marque Millennium Capital Management, LLC. The matter involves a note/loan provided by Mr. Taheny to Marque. On October 11, 2013, a default judgment was issued by the Honorable Elizabeth Emerson of The Supreme Court of Suffolk County in the amount of $135,258.71 plus interest through the day of collection. The notice of default had been served on Mr. Meckel, the President Chairman and -- to the best of my knowledge -- sole shareholder of…

On 10/16/2015, CM met with the client and completed Bi-Weekly ILP Review. CM inquires the reason client couldn’t meet with CM on 10/13/2015. Client reported she got caught up with her recycling bottles. She mentioned this area the supermarket close at 7pm and she travel to Malcolm X. she also mentioned having problem at two different supermarket with the store manager. In the meeting client as usual was very talkative and cooperative. She appears her stage age and she appropriately dressed for…

The plaintiffs, mother and little baby girl, claim for false detainment by the defendants in their jewellery shop in downtown Victoria on July 4, 1992. The defendants deny the asserted detainment, guaranteeing that they told the plaintiff Joanne Jeeves she was allowed to leave the business premises. The defendants counterclaim against the plaintiff Joanne Jeeves for defamation emerging out of a record of the occurrence given by her to the daily paper correspondents and which showed up in a…

Reasonover is not bound to the clause. The Federal Arbitration Act regulates arbitration of disputes which are subject to arbitration clauses. Even though the FAA has put in place a policy favoring arbitration, it is first necessary to determine whether the parties actually entered into an agreement to arbitrate disputes. Reasonover subscribed to a seven day trial period with Clearwire. The modem was shipped to her via FedEx, however when the package was attempted to be delivered she was…

On Thursday, February 18th 2016 I attended multiple court hearings at the Marion County Courthouse in Marion, OH. In this particular court-house there are two common pleas court rooms along with two judges which include Judge Slagle and Judge Finnegan. I felt it necessary to observe both courtrooms of the courthouse to get the most out of this experience. Judge Finnegan’s courtroom was much larger than Judge Slagle’s but seemed to have been more out of date compared to Slagle’s courtroom. In…

In the case McNabb v. Bay Village Club Condominium Assoc. The plaintiff argues that there was hydraulic oil outside the elevator doors that he did not see. After he fell he saw that the oil was seeping from under the door of a machine next to the elevator. The puddle of oil was about four or five feet wide . Two witnesses said they saw the oil there, and one of the witnesses reported it to the maintenance man. Another witness didn’t notice any footprints in the oil. Lastly the elevator was…