Court of Chancery

In the alternative, the relief approach focuses more on what sort of relief the plaintiff alleges in their complaint. The Ninth Circuit developed the relief approach in the aftermath of Smith v. Robinson; 20 U.S.C. § 1415(l) was interpreted to mean that the existence of the ADA and Title V of the Rehabilitation Act logically meant that claims of relief must exist outside the scope of the IDEA because the IDEA was no longer the exclusive avenue for ensuring the rights of handicapped children.xxv…

Dear judge. This is my Declaration regarding our case For Grandparent visitation. I Am the father of the 3 children And the son of the petitioner Victoria Montano-Burke. I’m writing This letter for the concern of our children’s health and wellbeing. Our children have been full of stress and also poor eating habits. Are youngest child Logan Arnold has been chewing his fingers and Bitting his nails ever since this visitation has started. Our middle child Mason Arnold has been eating poorly and his…

Eric Carr once said, “I can't say why people lie; they just do. Everyone has their own reasons for not telling the truth”. The task of determining truth rests in the hands of every human at one point or another. In order to ascertain a statement’s truth value, we must analyze an individual’s known or unknown motives behind their statement, considering both formal and informal settings. In formal settings, such as a courtroom, provide jurors and onlookers with the difficult task of determining…

with a criminal defense lawyer, you may decide that you are not in the position to hire a private law professional. You may decide that you will go with one that is court-appointed. Perhaps you have thought in the past that this meant you would be choosing something inferior, because you cannot afford better. The reality is that court-appointed lawyers are well trained and actually more experienced…

of intentionality and burdens is easier to prove than the criminal case. With a criminal case, the prosecutors must meet to get a conviction. In a criminal case the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. It’s the prosecutor job to prove to the court that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury will decide in a civil case if the defendant is guilty or not. If the evidence provided is not enough to prove the defendant guilty, the case will be dismiss. The jury must decide…

The New York Conspiracy Trials was a supposed plot by the poor white people and the enslaved African Americans to revolt, burn down New York City and kill the rich white citizens of New York. After a string of fires that burned down several buildings in New York slaves were identified as the only possible suspects, which are depicted in “Reading and Writing Terror: The New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741” written by Andy Doolen and in “The New York Conspiracy, Or A History of the Negro Plot”…

As I am reading the book, I will be predicting the case verdict. I believe that the case will be decided that Tom Robinson is innocent and that Mr. Ewell was bluffing. One major reason I believe the case will be decided in favor of the defendants because there was no evidence to support the rape that was accused by Tom Robinson. First off, he is a crippled human being because “his left arm was fully twelve inches shorter than his right arm “(Lee 248). He is also right-handed so it would be…

Modification Of Existing Custody Order before the honorable Judge, in the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County, Pennsylvania. Complete the petition with ink and attach all 7 forms of the packet duly filling them with reference to the plaintiff and defendant in spite of who is filing the petition. Submit copy of every document with the Prothonotary. Maintain dress code as required, turn off the cell phone when in the court. You must be over 18 years of age for acquiring eligibility to file a…

then charged with burglary. Mempa’s probation was revoked, due to the burglary charge, and during the revocation process, Mempa had no counsel to represent him, was not offered the option of having counsel to represent him, nor asked of his previous court-appointed counsel. He plead guilty to the burglary charges and was sentenced to 10 years maximum, in compliance to Washington State Law ("Mempa v. Rhay 389 U.S. 128 (1967)", 2017). Within six years, Mempa sought a writ of Habeas Corpus because…

the Supreme Court held that the woman is subject to the proclivities of the husband’s behavior. Therefore, the court wrote, “every man must govern his household, and if by reason of an unruly temper, or an unbridled tongue, the wife persistently treats her husband with disrespect, and he submits to it, he not only loses all sense of self-respect, but loses the respect of the other members of his family, without which he cannot expect to govern them” (Joyner v. Joyner, 1862). The court reasoned…