Contract

This firm represents Abbey Randt in her employment dispute with Roell Painting (the “company”). On May 25, 2017 Ms. Randt was terminated from her position at the company. (JUMPED) Attached to this correspondence is our redlined copy of the termination agreement along with our counter offer to settle this dispute. Factual Background In December of 2015 Ms. Randt and Isaac Vogal started a friendship which eventually progressed into a romantic relationship. In March 2016, the relationship…

Woody and Smiley may sue Vicaria for negligence. In order to prove negligence, Woody must show duty, a breach of duty, causation, a proximate cause of harm, and actual harm. We would prove Vicaria had a duty of reasonable care to Woody and Smiley because of the special relationship between a pilot and a passenger. Vicaria’s agreement to fly Woody and Smiley proves the existence of a special relationship needed to establish a duty of reasonable care. We would establish a breach of duty by…

2.2.2 Constraints and costs of bandwagoning Bandwagoners have to pay considerable costs. The ECE state example showed domestic disagreements on whether a state should bandwagon put constraints on the degree of bandwagoning behaviors. One cost bandwagoners paid is the loss of autonomy in making security policy. Taking Japan and Canada as examples, their alliances with the US constrain them from making security policies fully as they are occasionally asked by Americans to devote efforts in…

While Columbus recently encounters the land yet he claims ownership of it and renames the locations, it is due to the fact that Columbus was not interrupted. By this, Columbus states that he did not encounter any interference or objection to his proclamation. Stephen Greenblatt states that it possible that Columbus believes the indigenous people would not object to him claiming the land, whether they understood what he was saying or not. The significance lies in the fact that Greenblatt brings…

1. Discuss some ethical problems that might arise in a commercial real estate sale for the legal professional. If a lawyer believes that his client is doing something that creates a serious ethical problem for him or her such as, commit a fraud, a crime or cause financial harm to another party. That lawyer might be inclined to breach the confidentiality to notify the other party. An ethical conflict may arise where, in the course of successive or simultaneous representations of clients, the…

Topic - Evaluation of Emotional Distress in Tort Case: Legal Framework The two parties seen in tort cases are the plaintiff and the defendant (Fotte & Lareau, 2013). The plaintiff is the person who has filed an alleged tort whereas the defendant is the person who has caused harm to the plaintiff (Fotte & Lareau, 2013). In civil lawsuits there are three types of relief they are monetary compensation, specific performance, and an injunction (Fotte & Lareau, 2013). An injunction refers to…

This case does not alter my decision because in this case of attorney-client privilege they were willing to make a deal to protect their client rather than present the truth (Siegel, Schmalleger, and Worrall, 2014). Many lawyers do not totally grasp the complexity of the attorney-client privilege, therefore they do not know and comprehend exactly which communications are protected and which are not (Marcum, 2015). With this being said lawyers can put themselves at risk for discipline and/or…

Fair market value is a standard typically used for real estate valuation, certain tax issues, and employee stock ownership plans. Fair value in a legal context is a standard typically used for business interest valuation for estate tax and business litigation. Fair value in a financial reporting context is appropriate for the preparation of financial statements. The terms fair market value and fair value are typically used in business-owner buy-sell agreements without proper consideration of the…

1.) On the first Matrix game I decided that my strategy would be to always choose A: Y loses 2. O gains two. I decided this because it seemed like I would be losing less. However, on the second round I decided that I would try out my luck and choose B, which turned out to be the wrong move. I went from -2$ to -5$. After this I decided that I would stick to my original strategy and continued to choose A for the following 4 rounds. Immediately I noticed that it was the better choice ending up with…

When advising a union or management representatives you have to be well informed of the situation and have clear and concise goals in mind before sitting down with them. You have to know who is an ally and who is against the resolution. You have to know how to approach the audience you will be facing and you have to know which power to use to properly negotiate with them. Using integrative bargaining would be best when dealing with unions because you want to create a win-win situation so that…