Contract management

g. CPT Reid was signed for this equipment and there were no evidence presented that he properly sub-hand receipted this equipment to SFC Picart or to any other members of the supply team. h. SFC Picart by his own omission, revealed that he received the sole keys to the equipment storage facilities from CPT Reid. When SFC Picart received the keys to the storage facilities thereby, he assumed custodial responsibility, therefore, obligated him for the property in storage awaiting issue or turn-in.…

in the case, we would advise the plaintiff to bring the litigation based on the breach of commercial contract in the US in New York federal court because this is in the best interest of the client and for several reasons we will state latter. In addition, we have to explain both the pros and cons for bringing a case to state or federal court and how the system works there, as long as the contract does not state a litigation country or a court. First, the appeal in state court is 30 days while…

Complainant’s Position The analysis of Ron engineering case is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the law of tendering for contracts. The case concerned the issue of whether the acceptance of a call for tenders for a construction job could constitute a binding contract. Ron engineering wanted their refund for 150,000$ deposit they did but afterwards realize they made a mistake. A call for tenders was sent out in order to get the $150,000 back which would be lost if the tendered…

Historically, Arbitration Agreements were a part of commercial business contracts. In 1925,The Federal Arbitration Act, or the FAA passed; giving employers the right to enact Arbitration Agreements in the workplace as a means of cutting the cost of litigating lawsuits in court. However, under the Unconscionable Contract or Clause.§ 2-302 ; Arbitration Agreements are not binding when entered or signed under duress and when unconscionable. The definition of an unconscionable is an unbalanced,…

win the breach of contract suit against Company A. The renovation contract covers the quality of workmanship that Grocery, Inc. agreed to when hiring Company A. The subcontractor B used by A did not meet the criteria of the contract. Additionally, Company A unilaterally decided that to finish the job was impossible. In actuality, Company A overscheduled construction jobs during a six-month time period which was a preventable situation that is the fault of Company A management, not an…

practices are also identified and sorted out by the contract law. As for a penalty, unfair means are avoided in a proper manner. By contract law, the true value is exposed and concentration of work for an output takes place. Contract law makes everything done in an easy way. Contract…

language in their written contract or to make a new or different contract for them.” Syl. Pt. 3, Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co., 147 W. Va. 484, 128 S.E.2d 626 (1962); accord Syl. Pt. 1, Hatfield v. Health Management Associates of West Virginia, 223 W. Va. 259, 672 S.E.2d 395 (2008). 7. The Supreme Court has also stated that “[t]he mere fact that parties do not agree to the construction of a contract does not render it ambiguous. The question as to whether a contract is ambiguous…

look behind the company and treat it as the same person as those controlling it. Therefore, the separate legal entity of a company is an impactful principle of law since the property of a company would belong to it rather than the shareholders, management, or the directors. As such, the future owners and liquidators would have a vested interest in the pursuit of claims of misappropriation of funds. A company is liable for its liabilities and debts. Moreover, limited companies provide a limited…

What are those two elements? Explain fully with complete details (1) the performance of a prohibited act and (2) a specified state of mind, or intent, on the part of the actor. Additionally, to establish criminal liability, there must be a concurrence (agreement) between the act and the intent. The Criminal Act—In criminal law, a prohibited act is referred to as the actus reus, or guilty act. In some cases an act of omission can be a crime, but only when a person has legal duty to perform the…

stipulated in the contract that the tenant will pay the rent every 20th day of each month as it was agreed that the tenant will moved in during the 20th. However, tenant moved in on the 10th of the month since the house was already vacant at that time. Furthermore, tenant agreed to pay $320.00 per week. The agreed rent is 1347 but tenant was being charged $1390. The applicant tenant filed the case because she wanted to claim that she was being deceived that there was a breach of the…