Common descent

1) Cathy v Eric An oral contract exists between Cathy and Eric as the requirements for the existence of a contract were fulfilled. There must be an offer and acceptance that had consideration and an intent to create legal relations. Consideration can be seen between the payment from Cathy to Eric. A term of the oral contract was that Eric’s farm land would be suitable for installing a marquee. This was found false and Cathy had to pay additional costs to prepare the land for the marquee. Hence…

Marcus Newell Beech-Nut Case Study Professor Finnerty 13 October 2015 Beech Nut Discussion Questions 1. In my opinion, LiCari did not overreact. I believe this because it is a felony to falsely label a product, which Beech Nut did with advertise on their products. This product was given to babies, it was second leading provider of baby products, which means mothers trusted this product for their small children. When I have my own children I want nothing but the best for them and Beech Nut…

Charlis and I set in the backdrop of Kerala tells the story of untouchability that existed during that time in Kerala. It is a time when the practice of untouchability in Kerala is at its peak. It is very rigid and followed very strictly. The story begins with a game of football among Neil, his friends and cousins. While they were playing Neil comes to meet a young boy named Charlis who begins to play with them. As the story proceeds we can see that how Charlis have been ignored and treated in a…

Law is a set of rules. Law can be utilized to anyone and is to restrict the human. The Malaysian Judicial System is based on the English legal system which succeeded by the history of the British. Malaysian Judicial System set for the cases like criminal and civil litigation. Litigation is a court process of starting and sustain or protecting a legal action. The Malaysian court system have both criminal and civil jurisdiction. They have power and have to be responsibility to hear certain cases.…

Case Citation: Eckhardt Marine GMBH v. Sheriff Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya & Ors [2001] 3 CLJ 864 CA Details of the case: The parties that involved in this case were Eckhardt Marine GMBH as an appellant and Sheriff Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya as a respondent. This case had been brought to the Court of Appeal in Kuala Lumpur at 8 June in 2011. Besides, there are three judges of the court of appeal involved in this case who is Gopal Sri Ram, Nh Chan and the last one is Haidar Mohd Noor. This case was…

6. ULTRA VIRES CONTRACTS A contract of company which is ultra vires, i.e., outside the objective clause as defined by memorandum of association is wholly void and is of no legal effect. The objection to an ultra vires contract is, not merely that the company ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. The main issue is not as to the legality of the contract; but the issue is as to the competency and authority of the company to make it. An ultra vires contract which has the effect…

A. What is Sukuk? Sukuk in general can be understood as a Shariah compliant ‘bond’. In its simplest form Sukuk represents ownership of an asset or its usufruct. The claim embodied in Sukuk is not basically a claim to cash flow but an ownership claim. This also differentiates Sukuk from conventional bonds as the former proceed over interest bearing securities, whereas Sukuk are basically investment certificates involving of ownership claims in a pool of assets. B. Type of Sukuk 1) Asset Based…

On the facts, Theresa is the the plaintiff and AirMalaysia is the defendant. It is question of whether Theresa can claim any remedy for the losses she suffered because of the breach of the contract by AirMalaysia. The first and vital issue to consider is to determine if there is a binding contract between Theresa and AirMalaysia. In order to constitute a contract, there must be offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relation. (Law Teacher, 2013) It is obvious that Theresa…

justice and how these examples are evidence that or fall short of the Biblical standard. The Code of Hammurabi and the Twelve Tables were sets of laws established long ago in two different time periods and despite their differences they share a lot in common. The Code of Hammurabi and the Twelve Tables basically established the foundation for todays justice system and laws. They established how people should be protected from the powers of others, what was considered acceptable and not…

I have read the entire case - SO Case Citation: Crandell v. Larkin and Jones Appliance Company, 334 N.W.2d 31 Facts: The prior judgement was for a motion to exclude any liability action from their product. Gloria and Crandell are the appellants and Larkin and Jones Appliance Company is the appellee. Crandell purchased a use Coronado dryer from Larkin and Jones an appliance company. It was described as a reconditioned unit with a “guarantee.” There was a 90-day guarantee for “workmanship, parts…