Common cold

1) Fines, fees and forfeiture are the different mode of punishment for criminal and civil offences under criminal law. Fines are a type of financial punishment for mostly civil offenses. Fees are a typical source of funds used for rehabilitation purposes that include treatment costs and for covering administrative expenses. Forfeiture is the action taken by the government by seizing the property of offenders. These offenders have earlier owned their property through illegal means. The situations…

In the English Legal System, there are many different areas of law. Usually, the English Legal System separate into two branches, which are civil law and criminal law. Criminal law is a type of public law where the government or the state will take up an action against the accused of crime. Conversely, civil law is a form of private law where the victim will sue a wrong dual who is also a citizen. Therefore, there are differences between criminal law and civil law. The objective of criminal…

According to Professor Ernest J. Weinrib, corrective justice is the idea that liability rectifies the injustice inflicted by one person on another. This idea is based on the fact that the parties are considered to be in an initial equilibrium stage before entering the contract but when this contract is breached one party (usually the defendant) gains while the other (usually the plaintiff) suffers from the contract. Corrective justice is the notion of correcting this inequality by giving back…

Summary The essay, “The Potential Unintended Consequences of The O’Bannon Decision,” by Matthew Parlow, seeks to provide an analysis of the potential effects of the O’Bannon court decision. Specifically, Parlow discusses the effects that the ruling could potentially have on Title IX, athletic opportunities, and the values of the NCAA amateur sports system (Parlow, 2014, p. 203). Parlow begins with a brief description of the O’Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association case, and its…

We as humans are much more similar to chimpanzees than we believe. While reading through the book by Jane Goodall, “Through a Window, My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe”, I noticed many references as to why humans and chimpanzees can be of comparison with one another. Another source that I got information about chimpanzees and them being so similar to humans is the video clip watched in class, “Monkey in the Mirror”, this video explains the cognitive learning of chimpanzees and it…

In “Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin”, realism highlights the challenges and negative qualities that Positivism encompasses, not only through criticism but a detailed explanation of an alternate perspective of how the law should be. Hart then responds to these criticisms that point out underlying flaws in the realists views, which indicate his modern view on Positivism and how it has evolved from a better known classic version used previously. Even though Hart does defend Legal…

This case was in between John Michael Malins and the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The appellant in this case is a solicitor specialised in construction law. On 1st of May 2013 he was part of Bond Pearce LLP, on that day Bond Pearce LLP merged with Dickinson D which then became Bond Dickinson. After the merge, the appellant decided to become a partner in a new firm. The solicitor did appeal against a decision that was made by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The tribunal found the…

WITNESS PROCTION IN INDIA- NEED FOR LEGISLATION - Pranjali P Devurkar & Reddy Pawan Kumar INTRODUCTION A witness is an indispensable part of a justice delivery system playing a pivotal role in determining the final outcome of a case. According to Bentham, witnesses are “eyes and ears of justice”. Often these “very” witnesses turn hostile, become untraceable or simply eliminated. In…

A contract is an agreement that legally binds the parties involved. Alternatively, it can be defined as a promise or a set of the same that are enforceable by law. By getting into an agreement, parties acquire obligations and rights which are enforceable by the court of law. The main method through which such agreements may be enforced is by the award of damages although in many cases the court may order the defaulting party to perform a specific action to compensate the aggrieved party. In…

Case One From my reading of this case I am of the opinion that Matt has a genuine case against the accused. I believe that Matt should take legal action against his competitor for misleading advertising. The accused has broken the Consumers Protection Act (2007). Matt has a valid case because it is affecting his business and if this problem persists Matt could possibly lose his business. Outline of legal issues • The advertisement of lower priced products compared to those which are in Matt’s…