Common carp

In Making your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner provide a framework of 115 principles dealing with persuasion, legal reasoning, brief writing, and oral arguments both budding lawyers and courtroom veterans can employ to persuade the courts to decide cases in their clients’ favor. While each of these principles was most likely laboriously scrutinized and meticulously fact-checked before making its way into the book, there are a few principles that emerge as more…

The civil and criminal justice system in America relies heavily on juries in deciding a person’s guilt, innocence, or even determining whether a specific party should be held negligent for a particular action or inaction. Jurors are summoned to serve on a jury in the community which they live. Lawyers want citizens to serve on a jury who can listen to facts and come to a conclusion based on the facts put on at trial. Jurors are supposed to be unbiased in a case; however, that is not always the…

Sidhu v Van Dyke This High Court of Australia decision revolved around a building, Oaks Cottage, situated on a 32 hectare rural property in New South Wales known as Burra Station. The appellant, Mr Sidhu, lived in the main homestead on Burra Station. The respondent, Ms Van Dyke, and her husband lived in Oaks Cottage, approximately 100 metres away. Ms Van Dyke and her husband paid rent to Mr Sidhu’s wife in respect of Oaks Cottage. Both the main homestead and Oaks Cottage were located on an…

In the world there is always minority being pulled over, accused and harassed because of how they look or their lifestyle by the police. Adnan Syed was accused of killing Hae his ex girlfriend and was sent to jail. While there was more evidence to be seen and others to be questioned threw the trial. This is why Adnan Syed deserves an appeal because the jury was biased, the cops singled in on him, and his lawyer was not thorough. During court the jury is not supposed to be biased to either…

Each Country has their own Justice System and each will differ slightly from the United States. In the end the end result is all the same which is getting their country as safe as possible and looking up the offenders that cannot be a good member productive member of their society. The two Justice System in this paper that will be discussed are the United States and The German justice system. Three items will be compared and contrasted within this paper such as International Police Cooperation…

The damages awarded in a law suit not only affects the parties directly involved. The myth of there being an abundance frivolous lawsuit is brought about by the big businesses. Corporations and insurance companies have framed several legitimate lawsuits as frivolous and the fabricated statistics are spread to the public to cause fear.5 The fear will also assist in passing tort reform laws to help ease the pain of excessive amounts being paid out in damages. A NLCATP internet blog went into…

Rose exhibits the notion that prejudices and biases are factors in every conflict and can obscure the truth. The microcosm of characters ensures that each character has had different personal experiences, Personal experiences often influence the way reality is perceived by an individual, Prejudices and biases often take effect in conflict and can change the facts. The 3rd Juror has a bias against the boy as a result of personal experiences with his own son. Throughout the play, the 3rd Juror…

Topic 1: Contracts: UCC Implied Warranties 1) Introduction In contracts, buyers and sellers need to pay attention to all types of warranties. Warranties give the rights to either the buyer or seller and state things like how long the item should work, how well it should work, etc. A warranty that is not always in writing but is understood is an implied warranty. 2) Summary of law on topic Implied warranties are warranties that are assumed and automatically take place due to operation of law.…

Historically, Arbitration Agreements were a part of commercial business contracts. In 1925,The Federal Arbitration Act, or the FAA passed; giving employers the right to enact Arbitration Agreements in the workplace as a means of cutting the cost of litigating lawsuits in court. However, under the Unconscionable Contract or Clause.§ 2-302 ; Arbitration Agreements are not binding when entered or signed under duress and when unconscionable. The definition of an unconscionable is an unbalanced,…

You need to know to choose car insurance Compare protections Like all insurers do not offer the same protections, it is essential to learn about the exclusions before committing. Learn about the actual protection offered. For example : - What will your coverage if you have an accident while driving a rented or borrowed vehicle? - Your insurance does cover the cost of renting another vehicle while repairs? - Do you pay a premium if you go outside of Quebec or the United States? - What is the…