Committed

One will be guilty which is when the prosecutor or the government proves that the defendant committed the wrong action. The other verdict will be not guilty or in other words innocent or acquitted and it is when the prosecutor does not prove that the defendant committed the wrongful action. If the defendant is found not guilty the prosecutor will dismiss, discharge or let the defendant free. But, if the defendant is found guilty…

Privilege crimes also known as white collar deviance, are usually committed by people who hold high positions in their workplaces and have a respectable status in their communities. There are several different types of crimes that involves white-collar deviance; these two are occupationally related, embezzlement and inside traders. However, the criminal justice system does not punish these crimes the same as they would crimes committed by the underprivilege or blue-collar crimes, because of the…

aim to hurt him or herself. Among children aged 15-19 years, suicide is the number four cause of death in the world and the number three cause in Thailand. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that there were about 1 millions people who committed suicide each year or average 1 person each 40 seconds. Furthermore, there were about 10-20 millions suicidal attempters each year around the world. WHO predicted that in 2020, they will be about 1.5 millions suicide cases. There’re many ways to…

person if they feel like they’re treated the same as caucasians, and they will disagree. Society is blindly unaware of the issues happening in this country, especially in courtrooms when African Americans are assigned a harsh punishment for a crime committed. In this world, caucasians have an advantage in this society and everybody seems to acknowledge it. What a large majority of society doesn 't seem to realize with caucasians having the advantage is that African Americans don 't have the…

behaviors, steal, kill a living being, or lie about spiritual attainments. In “Making Monks into Men” the ordaining monks ask “Have you not committed one or another of the four offences which require expulsion?... If he says ‘such an…

supporting reason is that even though they are children, they still committed the crime. First, according to an article titled “Should Child Soldiers be Prosecuted for their Crimes?”, “It is important that child soldiers are included in post-war justice, so that the whole community can see that the perpetrators of human rights violations are punished.” The minor soldiers need to come to terms with the past crimes they committed. Child soldiers will grow up knowing they got away with these crimes…

Genocide was definitely committed in Australia. It was committed during the First Fleet, when the smallpox disease was released as a military necessity and during the time of the Stolen Generation (between 1910-1970). One prime example of genocide in Australia was the releasing of smallpox during the invasion of Australia in the First Fleet (1787). The British fought against the Aborigines and were in a ‘spot of trouble’. They had previously ordered ammunition and supplies prior to their…

opposed.Those who opposed during the civil rights movement committed things called hate crimes. During the civil rights movement, many people disbelieved that blacks should not have freedom. The Ku Klux Klan committed crimes against black people, and civil rights leaders in order to dismay them from accelerating the civil rights process. The Ku Klux Klan, or KKK for short hoped to scare people into submission. One of the crimes the KKK committed the most was murder. One of the most well…

June 2012, the Supreme Court decided that juveniles who committed crimes may not be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, even in the cases of murder. The judges concluded with a 5-4 majority that the punishment of life without parole, for a juvenile, violated the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution which banned the use of cruel and unusual punishment. However, the minority opinion stated that any horrific crime committed by a juvenile should always be sentenced with…

right punishment to issue Richard Ramirez. I will argue that the moral principles of Kantian Ethics, and the theory of Gelernter defend the government’s decision of executing Richard Ramirez. Reason 1: As outlined in Kantian Ethics, anyone who had committed murder must be murdered himself. This is done to establish justice and complete our duty to punish wrong doers in the correct manner. Additionally, the…