Claim

MegCompensation for a constructive dismissal claim in Ontario is almost guaranteed where there has been a fundamental breach of an employee’s contract. Assessment is done on a case-by-case basis since each situation is unique. The following are some of the frequently asked questions about constructive dismissal in Ontario. 1. What Does Constructive Dismissal Mean? Constructive dismissal can take two forms. First, it can take the form of an employer’s action that violates a crucial term of an…

has been plenty of debate about who has the genetic claim to the Crimean Peninsula, and it is these debates that portray the conflict between the Crimean Tatars and the Russians. Vladimir Putin’s Russia has claimed that the Crimea peninsula has always been Russian soil, as the Russian people have always lived there. The Kremlin further claimed that the Crimean Tatars were just a group of settlers of Turkic origin, and thus they had no genetic claim to the land. In essence, they were considered…

Seen throughout history, humans of all ages and sizes have been culprits of murder. Even children as young as the age of ten have been raised in neighborhoods that were so harrowing that homicide at that age was seen as a normality. In order to punish these young children that have sought to commit the acts of murder, new laws had to have been passed. One major law introduced was one passed by “…the Illinois Legislature...[who passed] a bill permitting 10-year-old children to be charged with…

assessing fines under the federal anti-fraud statutes. Last year, Agape Senior Housing agreed to settle a whistleblowers’ fraud claims under the False Claims Act by paying $2.5 million. But the government, which had declined to intervene in the case, rejected the settlement. The Department of Justice claimed that, based on a statistical sample of the allegedly fraudulent claims, the case was worth at least $25 million. Agape appealed, and now the case is being briefed in the U.S. Court of…

formation of and present common law in Australia regarding settler interests and land claims demonstrates indigenous title to be an inferior and less important form of land ownership to that of white Australian interests. I will explain in this essay the prejudices and mistreatment of indigenous persons and their incessant struggle for land claims against the white European settlers, as demonstrated in the Yorta Yorta land claim case. I will also discuss the misconception and misrepresentation…

guments Rowland, R. C. (1987), define argument as knowledge claim were justify. Argument is also define as exchanging different point of view and idea. Argument help people to know more than just their side of things. It is a type of disagreement to give reason or support to their ideas. Rowland, R. C. (1987), also mention that over the past twenty years, while argumentation theorists provide the meaning of justification many experts in another fields discover knowledge. Soon the view of…

Personal Injury Claims: How to Fight Back Liability in a personal injury claim isn’t always cut and dry. In some cases, those who feel victimized can find themselves on the receiving end of a costly lawsuit. Defending a personal injury case is a complicated and serious matter; one which demands the skill and attention of an experienced personal injury attorney. Serving Cincinnati residents for over 20 years, O’Connor, Mikita & Davidson have you covered for the guidance and representation you…

There are multiple reasons why you should claim someone as a dependent. Dependents are very helpful when it comes to income taxes. They can help you save thousands of dollars when paying taxes. You can also get tax credits that would not be available without dependents. In addition, you are able to write off many things such as daycare payments and medical bills. There are two types of dependents, but each have their own set of rules. The first dependent is a qualifying child. There are…

and Kant’s claim for the origin of moral motivation. First, I will look at the argument made by Hume, who argues that passion is the root of all moral motivation. Then, I will examine the claim made by Kant, who posits that reason is the origin of moral judgements. After showcasing both, I will compare the two. Finally, I will conclude by arguing that Hume’s argument for the origin of moral judgements is the stronger of the two. It is more coherent, and better constructed than the claim made by…

Key Claims for Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands; Self-awareness of an action being morally incorrect reflects a reason why the person should commit it. Awareness creates justification for following through. (pp 64) The moral politician is considered someone that would be conscious of his bad actions, rather than believing all his actions are good. (pp 65) Rules function as a method to not only motivate people to act the best they possibly can, but to showcase what type of person…