British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection

Some medications and vaccines have been created in the past through this testing. A polio vaccine was the result of animal research and testing, which without, polio would still take thousands of human lives each year. “There could have been no oral polio vaccine without the use of innumerable animals, a very large number of animals,” Albert mentioned to a reporter before his demise in 1993. Multiple vaccines being created today need the animal experiments to prove them safe before supplying…

To be honest, there are probably more reasons against Animal testing than reasons that justify it. Equality has gone from a right that we fight for, to just another hipster thing to do. The central reason is mainly a plea to ethics. They’re not just empty words either; PETA exposes all around reveal the injustices they live through each day. The videos are graphic and traumatizing; nearly every account describes animals subjected to painful experiments without anesthetic, often suffering…

Morality of Animal Testing in Cosmetics According to a report written by the Physicians committee, 72 percent of American customers believe that testing cosmetics or personal care products on animals is inhumane and unethical. Animal testing is a horrendous way to produce ingredients for products because of the harmful effects left on the animals. Alternative tests have effects that are more suitable for cosmetic companies because the results are better and more time/cost efficient. Despite…

Over 100 million animals suffer and die each in the United States for animal testing. Animals have been mistreated all throughout time. Some say they should be treated equal to humans. However, others say they don’t have feelings and they are only here to fulfill human needs. And of course, we have the people that don’t care for the situation at all. So, why are animal rights important? Who helps make it aware to people? Several people believe that animals have no rights. On the other hand, a…

CHAPTER –4 JURISPRUDENCE FOR PROTECTION OF WILD ANIMALS 4.1 INTRODUCTION In view of James Mill, every man desires to have for himself as many good things as possible, and there is not a sufficiency of good things for all, the strong, if left themselves, would take from the weak everything, or at least as much as they pleased; that the weak therefore, who are the greater, have an interest in conspiring to protect themselves against the strong. It also appeared, that almost all the things, which…