Biblical judges

To start the procedure the target is arrested, this is the followed by the policemen telling their name their rank as an officer and the station they also tell them why they are being detained. After the subject in hand cuffed and calm they pat search them down to assure there is no danger towards them. They are then put into the back of the police car and transported to the station, when they get back to the station the offender is stripped of all things that can be used to harm themselves.…

The judicial role of determining constitutionality looks like a seemingly simple process: the judge, an important part of the separation of powers, determines whether a law is in accordance with the constitution or not. In reality, the responsibility of the judicial system is far from that generalized perspective, and this is where the great debate begins. When interpreting the constitution, there are two distantly polar ways of reading it. There are originalists (Scalia and Bork) who contend…

gallery. The judge sits at the high bench at the front of the courtroom and control the hearing and the courtroom…

The jury is a board of citizens that are put together by the court to heed to evidence, witnesses and decided whether or not to indict or proceed the persecution based upon the evidence being presented. The jury is an important matter in almost every case. Long ago, the juror was a vicinity witnesses who made their judgement base upon what they have knowledge of. The jury breakdown came when society growth has expand it through towns. Which changed the role of jury from community knowledgeable…

In the case of Florida Bar v. McAliley, it is my position that it is a meritorious case. This case is about a male that used his status in the legal system to get what he wanted. It was found that McAliley filed frivolous motions in order to have a different outcome of the case between him and his ex-wife. McAliley did not want to pay child support there for he utilized numerous lawyers to file motions that were found to be a waste of the courts time. It was found that McAliley was held in…

As an arbitrator for Turnkey International, I will be responsible for challenging the selection of an arbitrator by Kardashia during a tribunal to resolve the dispute involving Turnkey International and Kardashia. This is based on my knowledge of the criteria for selecting an arbitrator and the circumstances under which an arbitrator can be challenged. The act of Kardashias of selecting one of the people that worked as a consultant with them as an arbitrator in the case is considered a violation…

Ashley Mayes is a lawyer ( Assistant District Attroney).She got her Bachelor's in Science Mgmt (BSM) in Business Mgmt and Legal Studies in Business from Tulane University in 2005. I received my Juris Doctorate (JD) and a Diploma in Comparative Law (DCL) from LSU Law in 2011. Also, she has a license in Tx, and works for the Harris County attroney office for 3 months. As she described her job description she said she was "what they call a number 3 prosecutor in Harris County Criminal Court at Law…

this ideal as “divine doctrine” as others may- especially in the case of Rusty. Take for instance Judge Lyttle, who accepted a $1,500 bride to drop criminal charges against Leon Wells; an action that I consider the epitome of unlawful service (Additionally to this, Polhemus was a facilitator). This example resonates with the case of Caperton vs Massey Coal Company in regards to a juries, or judges objectiveness in a case based on bribery; or the case of Caperton, monetary funding of supreme…

A jury nullification is the point at which the jury knowing and intentionally rejects the proof or refusal to apply the law wither in light of the fact that the jury needs to communicate something specific about some social issue that is bigger than the case itself, or on the grounds that the outcome directed by law is in opposition to the jury feeling of justice, morality, or fairness. In addition, an optional demonstration is not a legitimate sanction capacity of the jury. It is the thought to…

Apart from this system, there is the inquisitorial system, which is different from the adversarial system. The adversarial system is when the prosecution and the defense are trying to have the most compelling argument to convince the jury or the judge that their clients are the ones who have all the truth in the case. The court primarily plays as a referee between the prosecution and the defense. In the inquisitorial system, the court is involved in investigating the facts of the case. The court…