Bench trial

The Scopes Trial occurred in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. Although, despite the common idea that the trial was a true incident of unlawfulness, there lies within a controversy that resonates the idea that this trial contained no true legal value, it simply allowed for more tourist dollars and publicity in the small town of Dayton (Singham 23). In all actuality it is exceedingly unclear whether John Thomas Scopes truly taught evolution during his substitute teaching career (26-27). In support of…

During the 1920s, many events had taken place that have impacted American culture to this day. Some of these events include: the 1925 Scopes Trial, women’s suffrage and behavior, and the American film industry, too. The Scopes Trial brought about debates on evolution in schools, women’s rights are becoming more equal to those of men, and a revolution has begun in the American film industry. All of these events have had a lingering effect on how the American culture is today, and without them,…

everyone knew about the “monkey” Trial. The case was nicknamed the “monkey” Trial because of Charles theory that humans evolved from monkeys. Before the opening day, the town of Dayton was booming with people, the hotel rooms were fool, there was not even standing room in the court room. William Jennings Bryan, served as the prosecution attorney, and Clarence Darrow, an agnostic, was the defense attorney. Both Bryan and Darrow agreed on one thing, to make this trial a public display to test…

1.1 Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is responsible for significantly increased morbidity and mortality, worsened New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and impaired quality of life in the general population [1]. For instance, data from the longitudinal population-based Framingham Heart Study suggest that AF is solely associated with a threefold to fivefold increased risk of stroke [2] and with an approximately twofold increased risk for mortality [3]. The ischemic strokes due to…

My research this week focuses on the case study Merck and the pharmaceutical industry, (De Wit, & Meyer, 2010). In the past, the pharmaceutical industry was an investors dream providing profits even in a volatile market, however this dominance was not overlooked. The government along with health insurance companies stepped in to control the growing costs of prescription drugs by buying in bulk, thus reducing individual costs, (De Wit, & Meyer, 2010). The competition is also playing a key part…

To move forward research in the area of detection and treatment of cancer, using EHRs is vital because randomized controlled trials represent only 3% of patients, and most diagnosis and treatment activities take place within the healthcare system, making EHRs the primary repositories for data that have the potential to improve and personalize cancer care. EHR data differ fundamentally…

I believe Socrates have given the good arguments overall and have reasons to justify all his points, but I’m not completely agree with all his opinion, especially in the case which Euthyphro is accusing his father of murder someone. Socrates is a very wise and willing to explain and defending himself even with paying the price of him own life. What is piety? One of the argument from Euthyphro is that what is piety and impiety to the gods. One of the definition that article provides is that…

Plato’s “Apology” examines the trial of a great philosopher named Socrates. He is brought to court because of corrupting the youth and not believing in Gods. In response against his accusers, Socrates maintains that being sentenced to death is a possibility. While others fear death, as it is an evil; he does not fear it as he views death positively. According to Socrates, death is an advantage. His spiritual sign suggests this idea as well. Throughout his defense, Socrates has consistent idea…

Early on in Republic, it is clear that Socrates cares deeply about the idea of justice. However, he and his company cannot seem to agree on a proper definition of the word. They do, however, agree on various examples of what is not just. One such example is Socrates’ statement that “human beings who have been harmed necessarily become more unjust.” However, this statement implies that the only way to be just is to do what is best for society as a whole, rather than accounting for each…

Case 1 – Nestle - The Infant Formula Controversy Lydia Fontanez MGMT-539 Dr. Kay Green January 13, 2018 Case 1 – Nestle the Infant Formula Controversy Summary: This case study presents a problem the company Nestle encountered in 1974 where a British journalists wrote and published a report suggesting that the infant powder milk formula had contributed to the dead and malnutrition of infants from third world countries. The charges focused on the marketing of the product, which…