Arrest warrant

Introduction: In 1957 the appellant Miss Mapp was forcibly restrained by members of the Cleveland Police force while undergoing an unlawful search of her home. She had denied the police entry because they failed to produce a search warrant, though police still forcibly entered the appellant’s home. Members of the police claimed to be searching for an individual in connection to a recent bombing, who they believed Miss Mapp was harboring. This individual in question was never located on the…

During this six year period, made several hundred arrests for possession of illegal drugs, drafted and executed numerous search warrants for narcotics, attended Community Outreach Events, kept meticulous records, testified in Court, and seized over $680,000.00 in currency during drug…

immunity may be held legally responsible for an allegedly unlawful action generally turns on the objective legal reasonableness of the action. Especially where the alleged Fourth Amendment defilement encompasses a “search or seizure pursuant to a warrant, the fact that a…

officers were working on a large scale like even if they saw a small number of people on the streets they were arresting them. Even without warrants they were roaming around that specific area and whoever they wanted to arrest they did. The reason behind this large number of arrests was their high authorities who gave them pressure to keep the number of arrest high. The small deals were inside the prison and the big dealers who are having enough of power were out and doing their business easily…

within America as up until 1954 not one senator publicly supported the softening of anti-communist attitudes and regulations. It can be argued that publicly speaking out against the treatment of suspected communists within America would’ve resulted in arrest and potentially deportation such as had been proven with McCarthyism. The First Red Scare arguably had a shorter response period than the Second Red Scare. Responses to the First Red Scare…

responsible for any acts of genocide, when a state is having issues with process themselves. Therefore the ICC can be crucial to potentially help prevent acts of genocide by deterring the individual’s responsible using methods such as prosecution and arrest warrants. Due to the severity of crimes in our society the ICC is necessary to help ensure that all those responsible for the atrocities that have taken place are held responsible and thoroughly charged to the extent of the law for…

The use of incarceration stayed pretty constant from the mid 1920’s through the mid 1970’s. Then, from the mid 1970’s up to 2008, the incarceration rate increased every year. The biggest incarceration trend was from 1980 to 2009 when the state and federal rates increased fourfold (Bohm & Haley, 2011). The biggest characteristic of the incarceration population is that 9 out of 10 inmates in prison are males. The majority of the inmates did not graduate high school or have their GED, not…

they feel that they have enough evidence to establish probable cause they will swear out a warrant for their arrest. Now if the police observe the actual crime they normally do not have time to secure a warrant so they will arrest them right on the spot based on probable cause. Even if they do not have probable cause they can still question them and if after questioning them probable cause develops they can arrest them. The police can also…

This paper will argue; Justin Trudeau, the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and the recently elected Prime minister of the country, has conveyed the important need to amending Bill C-51 as he and many Canadians believe that it is contradictory to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. The emphasis on the bill has been due to various reasons but among the main reasons, the Liberal party believes that there is disparity with the Charter of Rights and Freedom. Most importantly it is the…

unique, whether it is a murder case or a simple assault case. This is why clients need skilled, knowledgeable attorney 's so that they can receive fair trials without police and investigators introducing evidence which may be illegally seized during an arrest. The judge has the ultimate decision whether evidence should be excluded or not, so bringing forth the Constitutional Rights of one 's client is pertinent. Judge Doe is excluding evidence during trial yet the prosecution asked the judge…