Archaic Homo sapiens

According to Rittenberg and Tregarthen (2009), economics is “a study of choice”. This simple assumption is the most basic definition of the general economic thought because if there is a scarcity present, then there is a choice to be made about this scarce resource. Moreover, Rittenberg and Tregarthen (2009) also point out that what distinguishes economic approach from any other science, whether social or not, is that economists study this “choices” assuming that people try to maximize their…

Vivian A Zelizer argues individuals will all behave in a different way in their responds or interaction with money. Every individual’s perception of money is different and therefore the way they value its significance is also different. The individual’s social and cultural structure matter because it’s these concept that define the way the individual feels about money compared to another individual whose culture and social structure is completely different. Concepts like these define how the…

ardipithecus boisei is 18.5, homo erectus is 35.71, homo habilis is 33.6, homo heidelbergensis is 26.1, homo neanderthalensis is 25.5, homo sapiens is 36.77, and sahelanthropus tchadensis is 18.5. The fact is if the opisthion index is less than 15, then that organism walks with two feet. We can conclude that all the organisms are bipedalism…

The Lebombo Bone is a Baboon Fibula, it is an ancient mathematical artifact. It was used as a Tally Stick and is nearly 35,000 years old. With the Ishango Bone is dating back to 20,000 B.C. it is yet another amazing mathematical artifact. Found in the 1970’s during the excavations of a Border Cave, the bone was found with nearly 29 clear defined notches and with it being found it was stated that it was the oldest mathematical artifact dating it was approximately dated back to 35,000 B.C. Judging…

Introduction – *Infraclass Metatheria includes pouched mammals andwas first proposed by Thomas Henry Huxley (1880) comprising 272 primitive mammals. *Metatherians are an…

Homo Floresiensis We are the homo species that were found about 95,000 to 12,000 years ago on the island of Flores, Indonesia. We are 3 to 6 inches tall being bipedal, having small brains, shrugged-forward shoulders, no chins, diminished forehead and large feet because of short legs. We are also nicknamed as the “Hobbit” after the tiny creatures in the book Lord of Rings. We have been the most spectacular discovery so far being the most extreme human ever discovered. We don’t look like modern…

Hunting and the use of tools are connected; without tools, there would not be any hunting, and without hunting, what would you really use tools for? Archaic Homo sapiens are associated with middle Paleolithic tool assemblages (developed Oldowan and Acheulean tools), and cannibalism as well as hunting other large and small animals. Archaic Homo sapiens used developed Oldowan and Acheulean tools, as well as prepared core (Conroy and Pontzer). Most of these tools used were either made from stone…

differ according to available data. In some, for example, Homo erectus is shown to be one of Homo sapien’s ancestors. Neanderthals are shown to be co-descendants with archaic Homo sapiens and as a dead end in the human phylogenetic tree. This would mean that they went extinct without contributing genes to modern humans. In other trees, Neanderthals are shown to have interbred with modern Homo sapiens. There are sources that claim that Homo erectus is the first hominid to display human…

distinction of and variation with Homo sapiens across the world in the late twentieth century. Since the emergence of life men have discussed palaeoanthropology and theories regarding the heritage of pre-existing Homo sapiens. It was believed that there were two different theories to the migration, whether or not they are true or just myths. One follows the concept of multiregional continuity and the other that suggests a single origin for modern humans. ’The ‘Out of Africa’ theory believed that…

related to Homo sapiens, but the question lies on why did they disappear whereas our species managed to survive? The first explanation of why the Neanderthals did not survive competition with Homo sapiens is they might had starved to death. The main reason being that they started fighting for the same resources after Homo sapiens migrated from East Africa. One important aspect of this explanation shows the brain develop according to their environment between these two species. For instance, Homo…