Appeal

The Georgia court system consists of a Municipal Court, Magistrate Court, Probate Court, Juvenile Court, State Court, Superior Court, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The Municipal Court has three hundred and seventy courts with three hundred and fifty two active Judges. The Municipal Court handles traffic offenses, local ordinance violations, conduct preliminary hearings, issue warrants, and they may handle misdemeanor shoplifting and possession of marijuana cases. The Judges in the…

has delineated the supreme court’s position for gay marriage law. Therefore, he insisted that states government should reserve their states’ power for the gay marriage law. Due to the belief of social policy and fairness, many same-sex couples had appeal for the nationwide same-sex marriage legal approval. Unfortunately, they are bewildered on United States law system, the supreme court actually does not have the legal power to make gay marriage law but legislators and people. Chief Justice…

Sidhu v Van Dyke This High Court of Australia decision revolved around a building, Oaks Cottage, situated on a 32 hectare rural property in New South Wales known as Burra Station. The appellant, Mr Sidhu, lived in the main homestead on Burra Station. The respondent, Ms Van Dyke, and her husband lived in Oaks Cottage, approximately 100 metres away. Ms Van Dyke and her husband paid rent to Mr Sidhu’s wife in respect of Oaks Cottage. Both the main homestead and Oaks Cottage were located on an…

The victim and one of her children escaped, the other two died of asphyxiation. The appellant said she had no intention of causing death, only scaring the victim. After the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the trial court, the appellant went further to appeal to the House of Lords, where it was held, with two out of the five judges dissenting, that there was no misdirection of the jury by the trial…

he was embarrassed and hurt emotionally by the actions of the manager. Procedural History The jury of the trial court ruled in favor of Fisher. The trial court set aside the verdict and found in favor of Carrousel Motor Hotel. The court of Civil Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court that no assault took place. Fisher appealed, escalating to the Supreme Court. Issue Was there a battery committed? Is the corporate business responsible for the employee? Holding…

Writing and Donald M. Murray’s Writing Before Writing, by exploring how effective the authors of the two works. I am analyzing and comparing use purpose, audience, persona, and context to convey what they are arguing through their usage of rhetorical appeals. To convey their ideas to their intended audience, both authors, Straub and Murray, appealed to ethos— credibility, pathos— emotion, and logos— logic and/ reasoning throughout their essays. Straub, “[a] specialist on reading, evaluating,…

of privacy. Time argued that they are afforded greater freedom as members of the press, and that they were acting in cooperation with the Attorney General’s office (after gaining permission prior to the fake appointment). The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that under California state law, the cause of action for invasion of privacy was established on proof that defendant's (Time Inc.) employees, by trick, gained entrance to the office part of plaintiff's (Dietemann) home where they then…

the best that can be done. Should hockey and Medicare be the defining features of a country that has sustained democratic rule for so long? He approaches the topic immediately with an emotional appeal to Canadians that motivates the audience to seek answers for what they believe in. Toope’s ideas form…

The thesis of this article is that American moms must bond together to reduce the gun violence. The author uses Sandy Hook tragedy as an appeal to emotion, so that she can appeal to other moms. She uses Anecdote to explain how she became the founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense. Since she mentions that more than 2 million children live in houses with unsecured guns as propaganda, she conveys the message…

personally, agree with the reasoning of the majority decision and will prove why. Summary The nature of the proceeding in the case of Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G is an appeal. The name of the court hearing the proceedings was called the Manitoba Court of Appeal. The judges writing the majority decision are: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L’Heureux-Dube, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin,…