Appeal to flattery

On October 11, 2017, a Complaint for Damages and Intentional Breach of Assigned Duties Against Power of Attorney for SELF-DEALING, MISAPPROPRIATION of FUNDS and/ or UNJUST ENRICHMENT of Assets or Property was filed in this Honorable Court by Plaintiff against Defendant, DEON B. CARTER (hereinafter “Defendant). Defendant was appointed Power of Attorney for the Plaintiff if incompetence emerges. A copy of Power of Attorney agreement created on November 29, 2016 which appoints Defendant is attached…

1. The following are extracts from Sections 7-107, 8-214, and 11-110 of the Maryland Code's Family Law Article that gives this Court authority to grant attorney fees at any point of the litigation whereas Section 12-103 gives no such authority: Section 7-107 (b) Award authorized. -- At any point in a proceeding under this title, the court may order either party to pay to the other party an amount for the reasonable and necessary expense of prosecuting or defending the proceeding. Section 8-214…

Pervear v. Massachusetts was a case over the issue of prisoners' rights brought to the United States Supreme Court in 1866. The Court was asked to rule on fines imposed upon a liquor dealer by the state. Pervear was licensed by the United States under the current internal revenue code to keep and sell liquor. He was fined and sentenced to three months of hard labor for failing to have a state license for his liquor store. He pleaded that he had a license from the United States under the internal…

COMMUNITY: Guardian Ad Litem Morgan Pristupa University of North Florida December 5, 2014 Introduction To begin with, the Guardian ad Litem community is international. Several places around the world have created Guardian ad Litem programs. For the purposes of this paper, I am focusing on the 21 local Guardian ad Litem programs in Florida’s judicial circuits. According to Guardianadlitem.org (2014), the Florida Guardian ad Litem program “advocates a strong…

I will be listing the three conditions that must be meet before a prosecutor charges a person with a crime and prosecutes the case (Bohm & Haley 2012). I will also explain why a prosecutor does not choose to prosecute a criminal case. I will also discuss problems that could occur due to one person having too much power and discretion. What three conditions must be met before a prosecutor charges a person with a crime and prosecutes the case? Why do prosecutors sometimes choose not to prosecute…

emails for proof. Magistrate Judge then issued the requested warrant. The United states in the end won the case. Wilson v. Sellers In this case, Marion Wilson had a multiple death penalties that were later denied. One of them went from the state court appeal system on to the federal court review system. Wilson wanted to review whether the state…

considered the scope of duty of care to the children and whether this extended to erecting barriers in attempt to prevent them from access when they had a deliberate intent. The judgement was handed down on 9th November 2001 in Queensland Court of Appeal. Facts of the Case and Issues – 2 minors deliberately ride trail bikes into fire. In the Queensland school holidays of September 1995…

waivers which give the Postal Service sovereign immunity are “any claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter.” (Dolan v. United States Postal Service). Both the District Court and the Court of Appeals dismissed the case, they both believed that the Postal Service had sovereign immunity because Dolan’s injuries were part of the…

In the WA Court of Appeal a retrospective test has been adopted in order to establish causation. This test is called the “Operating or Substantial Cause Test”. I advise the prosecution to ask him/herself, was the accused’s act an operating or substantial cause of the damage…

In Administrative law, standing is defined as a legally protectable interest that a person has in a dispute that gives them the legal right to file a petition or bring a lawsuit before the court of law to obtain a legal remedy. The standing doctrine concept derived from Article III § 2 of the U.S. Constitution that limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to hear cases involving controversy matters. Daniel E. Hall, Administrative Law: Bureaucracy in a Democracy, 251-252 (6th ed. 2015). On the…