Reasonover is not bound to the clause. The Federal Arbitration Act regulates arbitration of disputes which are subject to arbitration clauses. Even though the FAA has put in place a policy favoring arbitration, it is first necessary to determine whether the parties actually entered into an agreement to arbitrate disputes. Reasonover subscribed to a seven day trial period with Clearwire. The modem was shipped to her via FedEx, however when the package was attempted to be delivered she was…
Over half the tribal courts in Alaska have a tribal court system. The type of cases they can address are child related like, juvenile delinquency, juvenile status offences, adoption, child support enforcement, custody and protection. The courts also handle domestic violence, probate, and alcohol violations. Tribal counts cover environmental regulation, cultural protection, internal governmental disputes, property damage, property disputes, trespass, and misdemeanor offences. Lastly they have a…
harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). When at trial the prosecutor was able to show that the harassment of Ms. Arnold started when the two meet in…
Defendant, Martin Katz (“Martin”), by and through his counsel, hereby submits this Memorandum of Law in Support of his Motion to Dismiss. STATEMENT OF FACTS On November 15, 2016, plaintiffs, Lauren Katz (“Katz”), and Phyllis Rifkin (“Rifkin”) (collectively, the “plaintiffs”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. The material allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint are that Martin Katz and his father, Daniel Katz (“Daniel”), executed a power of attorney. Complaint, ¶ 9.…
THE DEFENDANT, Xing, Ru Li, by and through her undersigned counsel, June Zhou moves this Honorable Court to order the return of the Defendant’s property, and as grounds therefore, would show the following: 1. I am a legal resident of the United States and have a valid FL massage license. (EXHIBIT A). 2. I have been working at a Ft. Lauderdale massage store until August 8, 2017 and was going to go back my hoe in New York. (The police seized two checks dated on Aug. 8, 2017 that were…
It had been found that he had intended to murder her and it occurred as he attempted to discharge a loaded gun. There were two appeals made to the Court of Appeal by Mr. Kalajzich, which was an appeal against his conviction, and the other an appeal for special leave. Both appeals were dismissed/refused by the Court. In addition, two appeals made to the Court of Appeal Mr. Kalajzich applied to the Supreme Court under section 474 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) was also refused. Additionally,…
Case Citation: United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. ¬¬___ (2012). Parties: United States, Plaintiff / Appellant Antoine Jones, Defendant / Appellee Facts: Antoine Jones was a nightclub owner in the District of Columbia that was arrested in 2005 for drug possession after the police attached a GPS tracker to his vehicle. The tracker was attached to the vehicle because Jones was under suspicion of narcotics trafficking. The GPS tracker was authorized for use on the vehicle belonging to Jones’ wife…
According to the case of Christie v. Dobbyn2, it is not essential for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew if the dog is of a vicious or mischievous nature. Plaintiff Uniqua does not have to prove if Bob’s dog was harmful by nature or had bitten any other person in the past. By looking at the Donahue v. Belitski case, plaintiff went to the defendant property and was bitten by the dog and in this case, defendant was responsible for the damages in doctrine of scienter and negligence.…
For example, in Dufour v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 580, Dufour’s deportation order was upheld by the Federal court of appeal because the judge found that the order was based on his conviction for a breaking and entering, an offence punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years. An excellent application of these rules by the Immigration and Refugee Board…
This action arose out of an incident that occurred on February 6, 2013, at the intersection of West Fullerton Avenue and North Artesian Avenue. Plaintiff, Kevin Girard (DOB: 8/2/1983) was driving home on his motor scooter after having dinner with his wife, Plaintiff, Lindsey Girard (DOB: 12/17/1980) Mr. Girard was driving, with a helmet on, and was traveling westbound on West Fullerton Avenue in the right lane. Defendant, Sharif Umar, is a taxi cab driver who leased his taxi from Defendants,…