Appeal to flattery

Plaintiff at trial was Cellco Partnership, now Appellant. Defendant at trial, Shelby County, now Appellee. Facts: Cellco Partnership, Appellant, originally entered a lease agreement in 1995 with Cellco Partnership (Verizon) allowing an easement to Stonebridge Water Tower. In 2000, Highway 64 learned that Verizon had installed cellular equipment on Stonebridge Water Tower and accused them of trespassing and threatened to file a suit against them. In 2001, Verizon (Cellco Partnership) filed a…

Title of the Case: Averill Jr. v. Luttrell; 311 S.W.2d 812 (Tenn. App. 1958) Court: This case is on appeal in the Tennessee Appellate Court, from the trial court of Chattanooga, Tennessee, which is the original jurisdiction. Facts: On August 20, 1955, during a baseball game between the Nashville Vols and Chattanooga Lookouts in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Vols pitcher Gerry Lane was pitching to the plaintiff, Lyle Luttrell, when the fourth pitch hit Luttrell on his backside. Luttrell proceeded to…

In the Right-to-Know law case, Paint Township appeals from the 21 of October in 2013 order of the court of common pleas of Clarion County (Trial court) directing the Township to retrieve data from the publicly funded cell phone of Randy Vossburg, Chairman of the township’s Board of Supervisors, and provide retrieval records to Robert L. Clark (Requester). The township was ordered by the court to provide requesters with phone records concerning township business after Mr Vossburg’s cell phone was…

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court enter judgment in her favor and against Defendant, containing the following relief: A. A declaratory judgment that the actions, conduct, and practices of Defendant complained of herein violate the laws of the United States; B. An injunction and order permanently restraining Defendant from engaging in such unlawful conduct C. An order directing Defendant to place Plaintiff in the position he would have occupied but for Defendant's discriminatory and…

There is said to be roughly 17,000 courthouses that are operating in the United States. These courts are governmental organizations created to hear specific types of cases depending on the case itself. There are differences between the federal and state courts. Dual court system refers to the federal and state courts separation (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015). The purpose of having the federal and state courts was that the U.S. Constitution wanted the federal government to be limited of their…

and since then the American public has had only so much time to accept it as positive change in language. His audience is that American public, who are now questioning the possible negative advances that texting could cause. In order to further his appeal to logos he delivers the speech in a congenial manner towards the audience, strengthening his…

Misconduct in the courtroom, whether committed by the defense or the prosecution, not only defies the laws put forth by our Founding Fathers and violates God’s will, but it is also a direct violation of the public’s trust in the criminal justice system. The results can be devastating, and have far reaching effects inside and outside of the courtroom. Being truthful is covered extensively in the Bible, beginning with the Ten Commandments and in verses such as 2 Timothy 2:15 which discusses…

On July 30, 2012 three women from the punk group called Pussy Riot, Yekaterina Samutsevich, Maria Alyokhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova were in court on the charge of hooliganism for disrupting a church service in Moscow 's Cathedral of Christ the Savior. Although the evidence is enough to put away the three women the court acted unjust and biased throughout the whole trial denying Pussy Riot a fair trial. Since the Russian court system did not allow a fair and just trial for the members of Pussy…

another letter, Lendrum writes a letter of recommendation for Williams, a mining engineer, to Storrs. While both letters to Storrs are for the same purpose, Robert’s letter is far more effective. In his letter, Roberts uses his personal experience to appeal to ethos. He states he is the oldest blacksmith at the company, and should not be fired because such. Roberts subtlety claims his seniority over the man hired to replace him who has far less experience. This method makes a strong point and…

New Hampshire, Beauharnais v. Illinois, and R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul. In the court case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Supreme Court must look at the appeal of a New Hampshire State Supreme Court ruling that Chaplinsky’s use of profane language on openly public streets in a means that may…