Affirmation in law

plausible cause is "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be searched." The government has no right to go against that as they are the ones that created it.…

go free to clean New York of unruly characters, he oversteps the law to do what others will not, but doing away…

How can we continue to prosper in this country if we do not have laws or a stable form of government? We have been liberated from a tyrannical monarchy. The Articles of Confederation leave us with no military, no federal currency, and no organized government. A Constitution will give us more freedom, a stable form of government, and allow us to be protected through our consent. By ratifying the Constitution, we are sustaining our future leaders and paving the way for our posterity. In order for…

amendment reads “The right of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly, describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Thesis: The fourth amendment is the most important of all the amendments because it give people the right to privacy and the government and the…

government license to violate another.1 As the Supreme Court stated in Trop v Dulles the Eighth Amendment "draw[s] its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society."6 The Fifth Amendment Argument is an affirmation regarding the Framer's beliefs, not why those beliefs should be of concern. Blocher reminds us that “The same people who proposed and ratified the Eighth Amendment also proposed and ratified the Fifth, including its references to the death…

and seizures in violation of the Colorado Constitution was still admissible in the state’s courts.” (Cortner) Thus, the court was allowed to use the evidence from the search and it would be accepted, even though done illegally, since it was under the law of Colorado. Meanwhile, Wolf and his attorney’s argument and objection was that the evidenced shouldn’t be introduced or yet only allowed to be used. They evidence were products of an illegal search and seizure and according to the Constitution…

his unequivocal affirmation that when government fails to promote the general will, it is the obligation of the people to resist. Still, many modern scholars caution against civil disobedience of laws, asserting that there are more effective means through which change can be enacted. But in spite of their arguments, peaceful resistance to laws has been pivotal in creating lasting change in free societies across the world, and civil disobedience is not a flagrant violation of law and order --…

TSA and backscatter X-Rays is a technology equipment that is used to scan full bodies of airline passengers. It is also known as a WBI (whole body imager), security scanner, body scanner, and a naked scanner. TSA use the backscatter X-Ray to detect hidden weapons, tools, liquids, drugs, stolen currency, and other illegal items. They do this to make the flight ride safe for other passengers and to get to their destination safely without conflicts. Backscatter X-rays are only found at a few…

BIVENS: BRIEF #1 Case Name and Citation: BIVENS v. SIX UNKNOWN FED. NARCOTICS AGENTS, (1971). No. 301. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/403/388.html Court Issuing the Decision: This case was Argued on January 12, 1971, and decided on June 21, 1971. The United States Supreme Court is hearing Bivens case. Which court gives the final decision on the case? Statement of Facts: This case has it’s orgin in an arrest and search carried out on the morning of November 26, 1965. Bivens…

Which states as is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” . This shows that one can be safe by themselves, houses, property, etc… and that they could not be searched or seized away from them unless…