Administrative law

disabilities have been victims of discrimination and other injustices. There are numerous laws and acts that have been passed in an attempt to prevent the continuation of discrimination and unequal rights. As time progressed, the laws became more progressive, and have expanded to include more groups of people. A majority of the laws that have been enacted have been built upon foundations that were previously set by preceding laws. The first monumental court case that laid the foundation for…

Introduction Any law is a standard determined by the governing power for the benefit and good operations of its society. Any abuse of that law is bound to create social unrest and resistance, exactly the opposite of the effect that the law is intended to achieve. Hence, maintaining confidence in the exercise of a law as part of law enforcement in an increasingly blurred environment between law enforcement, security and intelligence relies on appropriate controls. The exercise of any intrusive…

1/2 hours. As liberating as the announcement may be to Clinton, it left a bizarre avenue for criticism and still found the Secretary was guilty of “careless” wrongdoing. For her carelessness, Comey said Clinton might be “subject to security or administrative sanctions” but that decision wasn’t being made during their investigation. Her intent was the centerpiece of the investigation and that was clear during this announcement. In citing previous cases, Comey explained how…

Four Aces’ fails to satisfy the elements so as to invoke the doctrine of estoppel. We hold that the doctrine of equitable estoppel cannot apply to compel the State to act in violation of law. “[E]quitable estoppel [is] the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is absolutely precluded, both at law and in equity, from asserting rights which might perhaps have otherwise existed, either of property, of contract, or of remedy, as against another…

specifying detailed instructions on how to handle the client’s information and keeping it private. Congress adopted the federal law with specifics on letting the client know how their privacy will be protected by clearly stating how it will be used and kept, the client must receive informed consent, and the process of transferring their records. So exactly what is the law supposed to do? Who does it protect and to what extent is this protection in place? How can one be sure that the client’s…

restraint if they wish to bring an end to laws that are not unconstitutionally obvious. In contrast, if it is declared unconstitutional, further action may be taken and a debate may be called for. They aim to keep the existing law, and improvise rather than constructing a whole nother law with influence from the Advocates of Activism. Advocates of Activism are court rulings closely found on particular belief with it be personal or political as opposed to the current law. There isn’t exactly a…

apply to particular contexts, such as workplaces. None of them represent a “hate speech” exception, nor have they been defined in terms of “hate speech.” For this very reason, “hate speech” also doesn’t have any fixed legal meaning under U.S. law. U.S. law has just never had occasion to define “hate speech” — any more than it has had occasion to define rudeness, evil ideas, unpatriotic speech, or any other kind of speech that people might condemn but that does not constitute a legally relevant…

budgetary, legislative, judicial and administrative measures to make sure that human rights are guaranteed in the society. Economic, cultural and social rights convention demands states to assist in order to achieve the rights given in the convention . 4.2 Responsible Actors…

DISCUSSION WEEK #11 Judicial philosophy is the fundamental set of ideas and beliefs of a judge or justice, in which shapes his or her rulings of a specific case. As well as, how both judge or justice interpret the law. Judicial scholars interpret judges and justices as being either “activists” or “restraints” based on their judicial philosophy. Judicial activism is the philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow, mainly their personal views about public policy to guide their…

transfer this inquisitiveness into studying Law. The inspiration to read law came from having the privilege to speak to a ‘Family and Relationship’ solicitor and the fulfilment I would acquire when assisting people with personal issues. My zeal for criminal law stemmed from my study of Psychology, which enabled me to understand abnormalities in behaviour…