Administrative Appeals Tribunal

that Trump is not only a strong, respectable, unselfish man, but also an ethical man, which is one of the strongest ascription that anyone can hold. Ultimately, Trumps last appeal was his usage of logos, including some numbers in order to ensure his audience that he knew what he was talking about. His first, and strongest appeal to logos came up fairly quickly when he references the constitution of the united states when mentioning giving the power back to the people in regards to controlling…

According to the section 3 of Australian Consumer Law (ACL) the term ‘consumer’ is referred as follows: A person is taken to have acquired particular goods as a consumer if, and only if: (a) The goods were of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption; or (b) The goods consisted of a vehicle or trailer acquired for use principally in the transport of goods on public roads. In the case Colette who is an owner of competing bakery complained of misleading…

consumers, instead solely focused on a profit. The argument is successful in its attempt to display the horrid acts of the executives in the Walmart company, which is accomplished by appealing to the viewers logos, pathos and ethos. The documentary appeals to its viewers logic by displaying numerous statistics showing the lack of concern from Walmart's executives for their…

Upon the death of an individual, the County Surrogates Court must validate ones Will and/or trust in order to satisfy all legal matters. A will is a written document, which takes effect upon death. Currently, all courts require a will to be typed in proper legal language. It is very rare for a court to accept a hand written will into probate. A will that is entirely handwritten and signed by the testator is referred to as a “holographic will”. It generally states ones last wishes and it is the…

In Last Week Tonight’s episode on Net Neutrality John Oliver tried to appeal to the audience’s pathos and logos, or the emotional and logical sides of their personality. This episode for example, judging by the five points of basic source evaluation: accuracy, authority, and is mostly credible.The most evident appeal here is the appeal to emotion. Oliver’s number one goal on his show is to make the audience laugh. Yes, the show tries to get the news of certain situations to the public, but it…

Case Name: Midler v. Ford Motor Co. 1988, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 849.F.2d 460 Procedural History: Bette Midler (Plaintiff) appealed a judgment summary of the US District Court granting the summary judgement in favor of Ford Motor Co (Defendant). Middler moved for appropriation of her distinct voice for use in a car advertisement. Statement of Facts: Ford Motor Co. aired a car commercial which they played songs from the 70’s to give a nostalgic feeling to their audience. Ford…

power” was increasingly growing into its biggest weakness. (Fulbright, 2012) Fulbright backs his standpoint with a combination of an argumentative writing style, along with pathos “an appeal to pathos (emotion)” statements, that would help convince most readers to agree with his views. (Driver, p.61) A pathos appeal creates an emotional setting, used as another form of persuasion in his writing. Senator Fulbright’s argument begins immediately with his thesis. The Senator draws the reader…

omission where the act or omission was the result of the exercise of the discretion vested in him, whether or not such discretion was abused. There is a line between discretionary policy decisions which enjoy statutory immunity and ministerial administrative acts which do not. Section 820.2 affords immunity only for "basic policy decisions” (Supreme Court of California, 1976). Therefore because of this state statute, the police were immune from the charges…

This court considered the Third District Court of Appeals decision to enforce the Clause Arbitration agreement. The court disagreed with the verdict to enforce the Clause, arguing that the Third District Court of Appeals did not employ the Seifert standard established as a precedent in evaluating motion to compel arbitration agreements (Basulto v. Hialeah, 2014). Additionally, the court found the Third District Court of Appeals’ decision to enforce the arbitration clause under the Federal…

Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed…