Justification for Law-Breaking Essay

Senate voted to expand this law to prevent the military and all other government agencies from using torture during interrogations of prisoners, codifying a ban President Barack Obama issued by executive order shortly after he was sworn in. The use of torture has been a hot topic for the past several years, mainly because of its use by the Bush administration and the intelligence gained through torture eventually leading us to finding Osama Bin Laden. Many try…

information disclosed. He speaks of a clinician who was able to persuade the majority of his patients to agree to have their spouse notified of the risk they faced (Kipnis, 2006/2008, p. 56). If a doctor can find creative ways to disclose the risk without breaking confidentiality, then he has upheld his moral duty to his patient and his legal duty to the endangered person. Even if they are unable to get their patient to agree to the disclosure, they have lived up to the obligations of their…

intentionally breaking their divine laws. Through King Creon’s use of power in the autocratic society of Thebes, Sophocles exposes a key flaw within the government system of monarchy; abuse of power. From the beginning, Sophocles introduces the audience to the core conflict that ultimately leads to the tragedy; the duality between characters of whether or not to follow the divine laws set forth by the Gods, or the laws set forth by Creon. Antigone strongly believes in the divine laws rather…

Raskolnikov, Sonia, and Dounia. Throughout the novel, Raskolnikov suffers through his struggle of mental stability and morality, with his pride being his greatest weakness. He provides a claim about extraordinary people; they are not bound by moral law, and they are superior to others.…

and pinned brother against brother in the fight against slavery. The issue of slavery, which had long since been pushed aside for future generations to deal with finally climaxed to its breaking point in 1861. Not even the like of Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster could have stopped the war from breaking out. The senatorial actions of the Great Triumvirate are outlined in John F. Kennedy’s Profiles in Courge which describes in great detail the passage of the Compromise of 1850…

a moral norm (Turner 7). This ethical theory argues the consequence or justification is irrelevant and determines an action to be right or wrong based on the action itself alone. Deontology differs from its opposing ethical theory Consequentialism, by stating that “right takes priority over good” (____). The thought trolley experiment dilemma, debates would you kill one to save five is an example of consequentialism…

In this article, Springer (2016) discusses the ethical and legal dilemmas when school counselors are presented with a delicate situation. School counselors may be fronted with issues of which the next step needs justification or permission from the law and code of ethics. School counselors are trained individuals that are responsible for decisions and prevention efforts that could better the lives of students within the school community. It is also important for school counselors to abide by the…

just laws, which Socrates obeys by staying in prison, and the prejudicial behaviour of Socrates accusers, who have sentenced him to death. The situation is Socrates accusers have sentenced him to death by using their laws. Plato gives the laws their own voice and meaning as he hopes this would separate them and make them their own entity, making them seem like human, a person Socrates may be able to behave unjustly toward. However, in this case we have state workers condemning Socrates and Laws…

examinations was that the contents of the category of crime, as defined by criminal law, varies over time and place. Crime can be amorphous in variety of acts, which had been defined as crimes at one point, which included printing a book, going into a market to buy goods for selling them at a higher price or serious offences, such as murder. So innumerable are the wrongdoings that have been defined as crimes by the criminal law. The diffusion of crime is unbalanced some procedures of crime has…

Laws are supposed to protect the rights of citizens and communities, “it is the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may be enforced by the imposition of penalties” (Schauer, 2015). Marijuana also known as Cannabis is a well know plant that is sometimes used and misused and is considered a substance that originated from immigrants whom entered into America back in the 1920’s. Prior to the immigrants using the Cannabis…