Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
63 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
T/F There is a 5 study minimum number of RRL |
False, no minimum number |
|
The themes or division of literature is based on? |
Statement of the problem (so if una namention sa problem ay yung demographics, then dapat una rin sa RRL yung demographics) |
|
Reasons for searching the literature |
- Highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of the research - Gain a critical understanding of your field - Opportunity to think about what has been done in your field - Able to think about what has not/needs to be done - Justification for research - Answer specific pt case-related (clinical practice) - To learn more/Education - Determine current best practice - Support and answer |
|
Types of informations |
Theory Facts Opinion Methods |
|
Type of info which is either theoretical or conceptual |
Theory |
|
Theory that is the foundation of variables |
Theoretical |
|
Theory that is a foundation of the entire study which involves processes (arrows) |
Conceptual |
|
Type of infromation that is in the newspaper (social sciences) and numerical/statistics basis (clinical |
Opinion |
|
Type of information that discusses or explains relationship between variables |
Methods |
|
Types of literature |
Non-empirical/conceptual Empirical/research |
|
Type of literature which uses reference materials written by authorities on the subject which embody experiences, viewpoints, and interpretations of the subject of the research study |
Non-empirical/conceptual literature |
|
What type of literature are books? |
Non-empirical/conceptual |
|
Type of literature that consists of studies and researches or theses and dissertations, published or unpublished, which have a bearing on the current research |
Empirical/research literature |
|
Primary source examples for empirical/research literature |
Professional research journals Research grants index Scholarly books World Wide Web |
|
Secondary source for empirical/research literature |
● Literature review summaries ● Thesis/ dissertation reviews ● Research abstracts ● Research papers ● Research critiques |
|
Sources for non-empirical/conceptual literature |
● Case Reports ● Opinion Articles ● Commentaries ● Clinical Description |
|
Types of professional literature |
Primary and seoncdary source |
|
Type of professional literature which is published, and authors are providing the original report of the research they conducted |
Primary source |
|
Examples of primary sources |
journal articles researh theses Dissertations conference abstracts proceedings |
|
Type of professional literature that is unpublished, and authors summarize their work or work of others |
Secondary sources |
|
are books primary or secondary sources? |
Secondary |
|
Categories of search tools for focused literature search |
Dissertations & theses & conference proceedings Single article Single journal contents scanning multiple journals people as primary sources |
|
Category of search tools which has access to abstracts |
Dissertations & theses & conference proceedings |
|
Category of search tools which a single relevant article citation can be used in several diff wways to identify other sources of information (aka paghahanap sa sources ng isang article) |
Single article |
|
Category of search tools which examine book review and abstracts of relevant articles published in other journals |
Single journal contents scanning |
|
T/F a book review will indicate whether the reference list is comprehensive |
True |
|
Category of search tools which you cannot go back to unlike books; and is primarily used in qualitative studies like in interviews, focus group discussions |
People as primary sources |
|
Before you start: ask yourself the following questions: |
What kind of information? Where would be a likely place to look? |
|
Hierarchy of evidence for articlees about therapy |
1A Systemic Review of Randomized 1B individual randomized clinical trial with narrow confidence interval 1C all-or-none study 2A Systemic Review of Cohort studies 2B INdividual cohort study 2C Outcomes research 3C Systematic review 4 Case-series study 5 Expert opinion without explicit crit |
|
Part of the hierarchy of evidence which deals with Clinical trials that do not have statistically significant variation in the direction or degree of results; Usually, done by 2 people (primary researcher and validator). |
Systemic Review of Randomized |
|
What does PICO stand for? |
Patient, population, problem intervention or exposure comparison outcome |
|
Good research interface should provide |
● Ability to search for a specific item ● Ability to search for related items to a known item ● Ability to search in a specific field or fields ● Ability to combine search Terms using Boolean Logic ● Ability to retrieve search results in a useful way |
|
Three statements according to the Boolean Logic |
○ Make your OR statements, one per concept. ○ Put AND between each of the OR statements. ○ Consider any NOT statements you might want to add. |
|
T/F In the Boolean Logic, NOT is used very often |
False |
|
Beyond basic boolean, you must also do |
Field Searching Controlled Vocabulary (Subject vs. Keyword searching) Specialty Features (Truncation, phrase searching) |
|
T/F Almost all databases will provide you with some ability to search a specific field or fields. |
True |
|
T/F Not all databases may make all fields searchable. |
True |
|
T/F Each search system doesn't require a specific format. |
True |
|
Part of the Hierarchy of evidence which deals with a study in which some or all patients died before treatment became available, and then none die after treatment. |
All-or-none study |
|
Part of the hierarchy of evidence which deals with Systematic Review of Cohort Studies that do not have statistically significant variation in the direction or degrees of results. |
Systematic Review of Cohort studies |
|
Part of hierarchy of evidence which deals with a prospective research design used to evaluate the relationship bet tx and an outcome. |
Individual cohort study |
|
Part of hierarchy of evidence which deals with non-experimental research inat evaluates outcomes of care in "real world" clinical conditions. |
outcomes research |
|
Part of the hierarchy of evidence which deals with Systematic Review of Case-control Studies that do not have statistically significant variation in the direction or degrees of results. |
Systematic review |
|
Part of hierarchy of evidence which deals with cohort or Case-Control Study that aid not: - Define comparison groups adequately; or - Did not measure exposures and outcomes objectively or in a blinded fashion; or - Control for confounders; or - Have sufficient follow-up (cohort studies only) |
Case-series study |
|
A description of the management of several patients/clients for the same purposes as a case report |
Case series |
|
Part of hierarchy of evidence which deals with Expert Opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research, or “first principles”. |
Expert Opinion without explicit crit |
|
biologically plausible rationales for management of pathophysiology. |
first principle |
|
T/F Field 'tags' OR 'labels' which may follow a period |
true |
|
pubmed field tag for journal name |
[ta] |
|
pubmed field tag for affiliation |
[ad] |
|
if you want to search for the singular and plural ver of a word, this the process you use |
truncation |
|
If you want to search for therapy, therapeutics, and therapies, you can use truncation to shorten it. How? |
therap* |
|
T/F If the word stem is too short in truncation, there may be too many possible variations and you might pick up unrelated terms. |
True |
|
This is when you want to force the database to search for a set of words in exact order. |
Phrase searching |
|
T/F Field tags or labels cannot be pubmat fiplaced in brackets or parentheses. |
False |
|
pubmat field tag for author |
[au] |
|
pubmed field tag for title |
[Ti] |
|
Pubmed field tag for textword |
[tw] |
|
Pubmed field tag for title and abstract |
[tiab] |
|
pubmed field tag for medical heading |
[mh] |
|
pubmed field tagt for date of publication |
[dp] |
|
pubmed field tag for language |
[la] |
|
pubmed field tag for grant number |
[gn] |