Study your flashcards anywhere!
Download the official Cram app for free >
 Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
 Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
 Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
 Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
 Read
Toggle OnToggle Off
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
A key: Read text to speech.a key
73 Cards in this Set
 Front
 Back
What is prevalence?

# of existing cases in the population at a specific time


What is incidence?

# of new cases in the diseasefree population that developed over a period of time


equation for prevalence

total # of cases at 1 pt in time / TOTAL population


equation for incidence

# of new cases over a given period / total population AT RISK


How are prevalence and incidence related?

P = I x average duration of disease (D)


When calculating incidence, how do you adjust the number for total population at risk?

remember to subtract the # of new cases from the total population at risk bc these individuals are no longer at risk


what kind of study can measure incidence?

cohort study
(longitudinal study > follows a group of people who do not have the disease, but have risk factors) 

what kind of study can measure prevalence

crosssectional study
(crosssection in time) AKA "prevalence study" 

what happens to the prevalence as the mortality of a disease decreases

people live longer, so prevalence increases, bc the duration of the disease increased
(think HIV pts getting treated and living longer) REMEMBER: P = I x D 

what is a crosssectional study

people in a population are examined for the presene of a disease of interest at a given point in time


what are the advantages of crosssectional studies

1
provide an efficient means of examining a population, allowing cases and noncases to be assessed all at once 2 they can be used as a basis for diagnostic testing 3 they can be used to plan which health services to offer and where 

what are disadvantages of crosssectional study

1
one cannot determine causal relationships bc information is obtained only at a single point in time 2 the risk or incidence of disease cannot be directly measured 

SENSITIVITY VS SPECIFICITY
"SNOUT" 
sensitive tests rule OUT disease


SENSITIVITY VS SPECIFICITY
"SPIN" 
specific tests rule IN disease


How do you calculate:
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV 


Define sensitivity.

probability that a patient with a disease will have a + test result
a sensitive test will rarely miss people 

what is the false negative ratio of a sensitivity test

False Neg Ratio = 1  Sensitivity


Define specificity.

probability that a patient without a disease will have a neg test
a specific test will rarely determine that someone has the disease when in fact they do not 

what is the false positive ratio of a specificity test

False Pos Ratio = 1  Specificity


What is the ideal diagnostic test in terms of sensitivity and specificity

the ideal test will be high in both


when is it desirable to have a high specificity diagnostic test

when there's a big penalty for missing the disease
or when it is desirable to EARLY IN THE DIAGNOSTIC WORKUPR OR SCREENING TEST to reduce a broad differential ie a diagnostic test for HIV/AIDS 

when is a high specificity test desirable

to confirm a likely diagnosis
or for situations in which the false positive result may prove harmful ie a positive western blot confirmatory test for HIV 

what is the purpose of predictive values

once a test result comes back, the results must be interpreted through use of predictive values (or posttest probabilities)


Define PPV.

the probability that a patient with a positive test result TRULY HAS the disease


How is specificity and PPV related?

the higher the specificity for a test, the higher it's PPV


how is disease prevalence related to PPV

the higher the disease prevalence, the higher the PPV of the test


Define NPV.

probability that a patient with a negative test result TRULY DOES NOT have teh disease


How is sensitivity of a test related to NPV

the more sensitive a test, the higher its NPV


How is disease prevalence related to NPV?

the lower the disease prevalence, the higher the NPV


because prevalence and predictive value are related, it is advantageous to apply diagnostic tests to what patient population?

diagnostic tests work better on individuals who have an increased likelihood of having the disease
(ie someone who is atrisk) 

what happens to PPV and NPV when prevalence decreases

PPV decreases
NPV increases remember that if prevalence is low, even a test with high sensitivity or specificity will have a low PPV 

Besides predictive values, what's another way to measure the performance of a diagnostic test?

likelihood ratio (LR)


What is likelihood ratios (LR)?

In evidencebased medicine, likelihood ratios are used for assessing the value of performing a diagnostic test.
They use the sensitivity and specificity of the test to determine whether a test result usefully changes the probability that a condition (such as a disease state) exists. 

what is the likelihood ratio of a positive test result

the probability of a person who has the disease testing positive
divided by the probability of a person who does not have the disease but tests positive 

what is the likelihood ratio of a negative test result

the probability of a person who has the disease but tests negative
divided by the probability of a person who does not have the disease and tests negative 

How does pretest odds, post test odds and likelihood ratio relate to each other?

The pretest odds of a particular diagnosis, multiplied by the likelihood ratio, determines the posttest odds.


How do you interpret the likelihood ratio in medicine?

A likelihood ratio of greater than 1 indicates the test result is associated with the disease.
A likelihood ratio less than 1 indicates that the result is associated with absence of the disease. 

What does it mean for a likelihood ratio to be close to 1?

Tests where the likelihood ratios lie close to 1 have little practical significance as the posttest probability (odds) is little different from the pretest probability, and as such is used primarily for diagnostic purposes, and not screening purposes.


How does the positive likelihood ratio change your odds of having a disease?

the likelihood ratio of a positive test shows how much the odds of a disease are increased if the test result is positive


How does the negative likelihood ratio change your odds of having a disease?

the likelihood ratio of a negative tests shows how much the odds of a disease are decreased if the test result is negative


What is pretest odds?

In summary, the pretest probability refers to the chance that an individual has a disorder prior to the use of a diagnostic test.
It allows the clinician to better interpret the results of the diagnostic test and helps to predict the likelihood of a true positive result. 

Describe how people are selected and followed in a cohort study.

assemble a group of people who do not have the disease, but could potentially get it
for each risk factor for the disease, determine if the people in the group are exposed or unexposed then follow the group over time and note the incidence of outcome events compared between the 2 groups 

4 advantages of cohort studies

1
the follow the same logic as the clinic question (if ppl are exposed, will they get the disease?) 2 they are the only way to DIRECTLY DETERMINE INCIDENCE (bc they follow the cohort over time to assess disease development) 3 they can be used to assess the relationship of a given exposure to many diseases 4 in prospective studies, exposure is elicited without bias from a knowing outcome 

3 disadvantages of cohort studies

1
they can be time consuming and expensive 2 studies assess only the relationship of the disease to a few exposure risk factors recorded at the start of the study 3 they require many subjects, which makes it difficult to study rare diseases 

Are cohort studies prospective or retrospective studies?

they can be either one:
they can be prospective in which a cohort is assembled in the present and followed into the future they can be retrospective, in which a cohort group is identified from past records and is followed to the present 

In a cohort study, what statistical test can you calculate?

relative risk
RR by following a cohort group over time and observing for disease development, the researcher can determine the Relative Risk ratio 

What does a casecontrol study analyze?

the population


How is a casecontrol study designed?

a series of CASES are identified and a set of CONTROLS are sampled from the underlying population


In a casecontrol study, what statistical test can you calculate/

you can estimate the frequency of exposure in the population at risk of the outcome
the researcher compares the frequency of exposure to a possible risk factor in the 2 groups 

How do you select the case and control to minimize differences?

cases and controls should be comparable in terms of opportunity for exposure
they should be members from the same base population with an equal opportunity of risk factor exposure 

What is confounding?

these are variables that influence the magnitude of a risk of getting a disease


How do you control a confounding variable in a casecontrol?

MATCHING
if somebody wanted to study the cause of myocardial infarct and thinks that the age is a probable confounding variable, each 67 years old infarct patient will be matched with a healthy 67 year old "control" person. EXCLUDE IT the easiest way is to exclude it (ie if alcohol has a negative impact on heart disease, choose pts without alcoholism) 

advantages of casecontrol studies

they use smaller groups than cohorts, thereby reducing cost
they can be used to study rare diseases and can easily examine multiple risk factorx 

disadvantages of casecontrol studies

1
studies cannot calculate disease prevalence or incidence or directly estimate relative risk bc the numbers of subjects with and without a disease are determined artificially by the investigator rather than by nature however, an odds ratio can be used to estimate a measure of relative risk (rate ratio) 2 retrospective data may be inaccurate owing to recall or survivorship biases 

Define absolute risk.

its the incidence of disease


What is attributable risk (or risk difference)?

the difference in risk between the exposed and unexposed groups


Equation for attributable risk.

Attributable risk = incidence of disease in exposed  incidence in unexposed


Define relative risk (or risk ratio).

expresses how much more likely an exposed person is to get the disease in comparison to an unexposed person


What does relative risk say about the relationship between exposure and disease?

the relative risk indicates the relative strength of the association btw exposure and disease
this is useful when considering what is causing the disease 

What is odds ratio?

this is just an ESTIMATE of relative risk that is calculated in casecontrol studies (bc it can't be calculated directly)


What does odds ratio say about one's exposure to a risk factor?

the odds ratio tells how much more likely it is that a person with a disease has been exposed to a risk factor than someone without the disease


What does odds ratio say about a person's chances of getting a disease in a casecontrol study?

in casecontrol studies, the odds ratio describes how many times more likely an exposed individual is to have disease compared to an unexposed individual


Equation for odds ratio.

Odds Ratio = odds that a disease person is exposed / odds that a nondiseased person is exposed


Define what the odds of something happening.

Odds = probability of event / 1  probability of event
For example, the odds that a single throw of a die will produce a six are 1 to 5, or 1/5. The odds is the ratio of the probability that the event of interest occurs to the probability that it does not. This is often estimated by the ratio of the number of times that the event of interest occurs to the number of times that it does not. 

What is survival analysis?

it summarizes the average time from 1 event (eg diagnosis or start of tx) to any outcome that can occur only once during followup (ie death or recurrence of cancer)
KaplanMeier Curve 

For a given Sn and Sp of a diagnostic test, and the PPV and NPV
what is the probability of having the disease if the test result is negative? 
1  NPV


For a given Sn and Sp of a diagnostic test, and the PPV and NPV
what is the probability of not having the disease if the test result is negative? 
it's just NPV
the NPV tells you the chances that you do not have the disease if the test result is negative 

For a given Sn and Sp of a diagnostic test, and the PPV and NPV
what is the probability of having the disease if the test result is positive? 
PPV
the PPV tells you the chances of getting a disease if you tested positive if you tested positive, the chances that you WILL NOT get the disease is 1  PPV 

BIASES
What is leadtime bias? 
when one makes an incorrect assumption that a "new screening test" improves prognosis and prolongs survival
the point is that the screening test was just performed at an earlier point in time, but the disease course was not changed THINK: "a new screening test" 

BIASES
What is observer bias (aka ascertainment bias)? 
refers to misclassification of an outcome and/or exposure
(eg labeling a diseased subject as nondiseased and viceversa) this happens bc the researcher placed a biased observation and made an assumption about it 

BIASES
What is the Hawthorne effect? 
this the tendency of the study population to affect the outcome bc they are aware that they are being studied
to minimize hawthorne effect, keep pts unaware that they are being studied, but this is unethical 

BIASES
What is sample distortion bias? 
when the estimate of exposure and outcome association is biased bc teh study sample is not representative of the target population


What is information bias?

there is an imperfect assessment of the association btw exposure and outcome due to errors in measurement of those exposure and outcome
minimize by using standardized techniques to measure 