Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
25 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is Stress? |
Stress is when the perceived demands of a situation are greater than a person’s ability to cope. |
|
What is a Stressor? |
Anything which causes a stress reaction in the body. |
|
What happens in the body when reacting to a stressor? |
The pupils dilate, mouth goes dry, blood pressure rises, sweating, and the breathing becomes faster as more oxygen is needed for muscles. |
|
What is the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)? |
The SRRS was devised by Holmes and Rahe and is a way of measuring long term stress.
|
|
How does the SRRS measure stress? |
The SRRS is a questionnaire made up of 43 life events that were ranked from most stressful, such as the death of a spouse, to least stressful – such as going on holiday. Holmes and Rahe called the numbers that made up each score life change units (LCU). The higher the LCU number, the more stressful it is – for example death of a spouse has an LCU score of 100, and going on holiday has an LCU score of 13.
|
|
What did Holmes and Rahe believe? |
Holmes and Rahe believed that an LCU score of over 300 meant an 80% chance of developing a serious physical illness in the next year as a result of the stress.
|
|
What research has been carried out into the SRRS? |
Raheet al carried out an experiment into the SRRS using 2700 American sailors aboutto go on a tour of duty. They were given a military version of the SRRSquestionnaire to assess how many life events they had experienced in theprevious six months. Sick bay visits that appeared to be fake were notincluded.
|
|
What did the research by Rahe into theSRRS find out? |
Raheet al found that as life changes scores increased, so did the frequency ofillness. There was a positive correlation of +0. 118 between life change scoresand illness scores.
|
|
What are the advantages of the research into theSRRS? |
Rahe et al is that it had a large number ofparticipants (2700), this makes it easier to generalize from the results.
Anotheradvantage is that the research supports the idea by Holmes and Rahe’s that lifechanges (stress) is linked to physical illness. |
|
What are the disadvantages of theresearch into SRRS? |
Itonly used sailors, this means that the findings cannot be generalized to peoplewho are not sailors -especially, because sailors are trained to deal withstress.
Itbe could be argued that the study was not well designed because it usedquestionnaires testing recall of the past six months, it is possible thatparticipants may have forgotten things, repressed things or simply lied to makethemselves look better – which means the findings may be inaccurate. |
|
What are daily hassles? |
Dailyhassles refer to the stresses of everyday life, daily hassles include thingssuch as broken computer, missed bus, being stuck in traffic, arguments with ourfamilies or girl/boyfriends.
|
|
What are daily uplifts? |
Upliftsrefer to everyday positive events. Uplifts include a smile from someone in thestreet, good grades on an essay or getting on with friends.
|
|
How can daily hassles be used tomeasure stress? |
Hasslescan be used to measure stress by counting how many people have and seeing theimpact on their health. Although daily hassles and their emotional impact lastonly a short period of time- if hassles happen a lot then the combined effectwill cause health problems. |
|
What research has been carried out into dailyhassles? |
Delongiscompared daily uplifts to daily hassles. |
|
Whatdid the research by Delongis into daily hassles do? |
|
|
What happened between the interviews? |
Betweeneach of the six monthly interviews, participants completed the Hassles andUplifts Scale and the Daily Health record at the end of each day for a four dayperiod. This resulted in 20 daily assessments of stress and illness, inaddition to data obtained during the six interviews.
|
|
What did the research by Delongis intodaily hassles find out? |
Delongis found a significantrelationship between daily stress and health problems such as flu, sore throat,headaches, and backaches.
|
|
What else did the research by Delongis into daily hassles find out? |
Thestudy also found big individual differences were found in how daily stress wasassociated with health and mood across time. Participants with unsupportivesocial relationships and low self-esteem were more likely to experience anincrease in psychological and physiological problems both on and followingstressful days than were participants high in self-esteem and social support.
|
|
What is the advantage of the research into dailyhassles by Delongis? |
Oneadvantage is that Participants could indicate the strength of a factor eitheras a hassle or uplift. This allowed for the fact that the same life event canbe experienced in different ways by different people or by the same person ondifferent occasions.
|
|
What is a weakness of the researchinto daily hassles by Delongis? |
Aweakness of the research by Delongis is that it overlooks many chronic (longterm) sources of stress. These may well have had an effect on the overallresults, so it may not have just been the daily hassles that caused illness.
|
|
What did Freidman and Rosenman want to test? |
Theywanted to test whether people with type A personality were more likely to get CHD.
|
|
How did Freidman and Rosenman conduct their test? |
Theyused a structured interview on 3200 Californian male volunteers aged 39 to 59and categorized the men as either type A or type B. They followed them for 8.5years to find out about their health.
|
|
What did Freidman and Rosenman find from their test? |
Bythe end of the study, 256 men in the sample had developed CHD, of which 70%were from the type A group – this was twice the rate of heart disease found inthe type B group.
Theyconcluded that type A personalities seem to be at a higher risk of gettingstress related illnesses – such as CHD. |
|
What is an advantage of the research by Frediman and Rosenman? |
It used a largenumber of people (3200), this makes it easier to generalise the results.
|
|
What is the weakness of the researchby Freidman and Rosenman? |
a. The study by Friedman and Rosenman is weak because having only two personality types seems a bit simplistic – because people are more complicated than that. It is also simplistic to suggest that people are either type A or type B – it may be possible for a person to have characteristics of both type A and type B personality.
|