• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
how does tort reform efforts seek to control products liability claim costs
by capping damages, limmiting standards to which products are held, and discouraging frivolous suits
there are 3 sources of PL (Product Liability) law
1. breach of contract
2. strict liability
3. negligence
breach of warranty
action in breach of contract resulting in BI and PD
express warranty
guarantees the product's quality or performance and is one of the bases of the product's sale. warranty need not appear in writing
implied warranty
court-imposed obligation. carry greater weight in lawsuit bc express warranty is based on statements the seller has made about product while implied exists regardless of agreement or understanding
implied warranty of merchantability
requires merchants to provide goods that are safe and reasonably fit for their intended purpose.
doesnt apply to non-merchants who have no knowledge about the goods they sell
implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
requires the seller to provide goods that are fit for their intended use. warranty applies to non-merchants
strict liability in tort
legal actions are based on the selling of any unreasonably dangerous product in a defective condition
privity of contract
the need to establish a contractual relationship between buyer and seller
products may be defective in 3 ways
1. due to faulty manufacture or assembly
2. due to unsafe design - including concealed defects and inadequate safety guards. in general, the state of the art at the time of manufacture governs design and safety standards
3. due to the manufacturer's failure to warn of the product's inherent and foreseeable dangers
plaintiff must prove these 3 elements to bring successful suit
1. product was defective when it left the manufacturer or supplier
2. the defect made the product unreasonably dangerous
3. the defective product was the direct cause of his injury
the restatement of torts rule
extends protection to the injured ultimate user or consumer (such as when the ultimate buyer makes a gift of the product)
the strict liability applies to
any person who engages in the business of selling a product, including manufacturers and distributors, wholesalers and retailers, bailors, lessors, builders, and contractors
strict liability
protect the injured ultimate buyer of a defective product and any injured nonusers
negligence
legal actions are based on violation of the duty to safely:
1. design the product
2. produce the product
3. test and inspect the product
4. clearly warn of and instruct the product user regarding non-obvious dangers
what are the 11 defense to product liability
1. state of the art - prove the product was as safe as it could be made when it was made
2. compliance w/ product specification - prove the product was designed according to the 3rd party's specifications, and that those specs showed no obvious defects
3. open and obvious dangers - prove the injury was caused by a common, open, and obvious propensity of the product(knives can cut;gasoline is flammable)
4. plaintiff's kmowledge - prove the buyer's knowledge of the product at least equaled that of the manufacturer, relieving the mamufacturer of the duty to warn the buyer
5. assumption of risk - prove the buyer contributed to the injury by knowingly using a defective product
6. misuse - prove the buyer used the product abnormally
7. alteration of product - prove the defect was caused by post-sale modification of the product
8. written disclaimer - prove the seller provided the buyer w/ a written disclaimer for responsibility for defects and their resulting injuries.
9. post-accident product change - plaintiff cannot use subsquent changes to the manufacture of the product as proof that the product he brought was defective (and hense needed alteration)
10. existence of a middleman - prove the product defect was caused by the distributor's or seller's unforseeable actions or omissions
11. allergy and susceptibility - prove the product warned the buyer of possible allergic reactions or the percentage of allergice users of the product was so small that warning wasnt needed
disclaimers are only effective when the plaintiff
1. is the buyer
2. was fully aware of the disclaimer at the time of purchase
general aggregate limit
This aggregate limit is the most the insurer will pay for all sums as damages because of bodily injury, property damage, personal and advertising injury except for those sums paid as damages because of bodily injury or property damage included within the products-completed operations hazard. The products-completed operations hazard is defined in the policy and a separate aggregate limit applies to such claims or suits.

Included within the general aggregate are damages paid under insuring agreements Coverage C—medical payments and Coverage B—personal and advertising injury.
products/completed operations aggregate limit
applies independently of the general aggregate limit. Sums paid under the general aggregate limit do not reduce the products-completed operations aggregate limit and vice versa. Consequently, under the CGL policy, an insurer's total liability or exposure in a policy period policy is the sum of the two aggregate limits.
personal and advertising injury limit
This limit is independent of the each occurrence limit. Hence, it is possible that an insurer may be required to pay both the personal and advertising injury limit and each occurrence limit.

The personal and advertising injury limit applies not by offense, but separately to each person or organization that sustains damages because of a covered offense or offenses. However, regardless of the number of persons or organizations claiming damages from a covered offense, or regardless of the number of offenses claimed during the policy period, the insurer is obligated to pay no more than the general aggregate limit.
each occurrence limit
the most the insurer will pay for BI, PD and medical expenses incurred as a result of any one occurrence (event)
Aggregate Limits
An aggregate limit is the most the insurer will pay during the policy period. Once an insurer is legally obligated to pay the full amount of the aggregate limit (either by judgment or settlement), the insurer has no further obligation to the policyholder during the remainder of the policy period for any subsequent claims or suits that are otherwise covered by the policy and that would be payable under that aggregate limit.
Damage to Premises Rented to You Limit
is the most the insurer will pay for damages due to PD to premises rented or temporarily occupied by the named insured w/ the owner's permission
medical expense limit
the most the insurer will pay for all medical expeses due to BI sustained by each person
underwriting consideration for completed operations hazards
1. products and completed operations hazards
2. CGL Policy exclusions
3. products liability underwriting factors and their information sources
4. completed operations underwriting factors
the products hazard includes all BI and PD arising out of "your product" when:
1. occurring away from premises owned or rented by the insured (on premises loss is covered under premises and operations coverage)
2. occurring after the product is in someone else's phyiscal possession
"your product"
goods or products other than real property that are manufactured, sold, handled, distributed, or disposed of by the named insured, those trading under the named insured's name, or a person or org owned by the named insured.
does not include restaurants and other businesses that sell food and drink to be consumed on the premises
products/completed operations hazared redefined
modifies the hazard to include BI and PD caused by the insured's products frm the time the insured relinquishes physical possession
the completed operations hazard includes all BI and PD arising out of "your work" occurring
1. away from premises owned or rented by the insured (on premises loss is covered under premises and operations coverage)
2. after the work has been completed or abandoned
-- work is completed when
1. the contracted work is finished
2. work at one contracted site is finished
3. part of the work at a contracted site has been put to its intended use
"your work"
includes work or operations performed by the named insured or by others on the insured's behalf including any furnished materials, parts, or equipment.
includes any warranties or representations made as to the fitness, quality, durability, or performance of the work
exclusion of damage to the named insured's product
excludes PD coverage to "your product" arising out of the product itself or any part of the product.
this exclusion applies even if a part of the product damages the rest of the product or if the underlying cause of the damage is attributable to another firm (manufacturer, assembler, or suppier of a component)
definition of property
1. physical injury to tangible property, including loss of use
2. loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured
exclusion of property damage to named insured's work -- aka the injury to work performed exclusion
excludes PD to "your work" that
1. arises out of the work itself or any part of it
2. is included in the products-completed operations hazard
this exclusion applies only to the products-completed operations hazard, doesnt apply to insured's subcontractors' work