• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
LPMPA s2
all contracts for the disposition of land will be void inless they are in writing and signed by the parties to the contract
UBK v Sahib
s2 lpmpa has abolished the possibility of creation of a mortgage or charge by deposit of title deeds
LPA s53(1)(b)
trusts of land should be evidenced in writing
LPA s53(1)(c)
dispositions of existing equitable interests must be in writing
Vandervell
s53(1)(c) is to prevent hidden oral fraudulent transactions
Grey
disposition should be given its natural meaning
Re Paradise
a disclaimer of beneficial interest is not a disposition of a beneficial interest within s53(1)(c)
Grainge v Wilberforce
where a B declares he is holding his BI on trust for another, this isnt a disposition but rather a declaration of a subtrust only requiring writing if it contains land-up for debate-Paul Matthews
Neville v Watson
endorsed OUGHTRED-the benefit of the contract , a chose in action was held by the legal owner for the benefit of the person who had provided valuable consideration
Vandervell pt 2
where an equitable owner, absolutely entitled and capable of doing so makes an oral declaration to the trustee to transfer legal title to a transferee intending at the same time that the equitable title is transferred to the same transferee, no need to comply with s53(1)(c)