Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
9 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Critic Deck |
Critic Deck |
|
|
Critic Instructions |
Snowflake- Play whenever you believe another player is taking the game too seriously. Who Cares?- The critic can play this if they believe the claim isn't worth arguing about. Socratic Question Card- play this and try to falsify the reasoning with an analogous argument you think the claimer would reject. False Analogy- play if you think an analogy for the reasoning isn't a good one. Be ready to explain why. Source Search- If the player thinks that one or more pieces of supposed, supporting information is not true, they can play this card which will prompt a source search. Bad Source- Play when you think a certain person's source is a bad source and when you think you can convincingly explain why. Vote- several times in the game. The green card represents a vote in the affirmative. |
|
|
Play whenever you believe another player is taking the game too seriously, agrees to the rules but is then upset by them, or refuses to continue playing. |
|
|
Who Cares? |
Play when you believe that it is irrelevant whether the claim is true. Be prepared to explain why. |
|
|
Socratic Question |
This card allows you to ask a question regarding the reasoning of the argument. |
|
|
False Analogy |
Play if you believe an analogy given to challenge the claimer's reasoning isn't a good analogy. Be ready to explain why the circumstances of the claimer's argument is different. |
|
|
Source Search |
If the player thinks that one or more pieces of supposed, supporting information is not true, they can play this card which will prompt a source search. |
|
|
Bad Source |
You can play this card when you believe another player has shared an unreliable or irrelevant source. There are a few questions to think about when evaluating each source. Is the source managed by multiple relevant experts? Is it peer-reviewed? Is the source the primary creator of the information or data or are they citing another source? Do you have to pay to publish there? Are there conflicts of interest (especially financially) that may have biased the results being given? Does the information or data being given adequately support or contradict the information given by the claimer? Is the information outdated or has it been redacted? |
|
Vote Use this card to Vote affirmative |
Vote Use this card to Vote affirmative |
