Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
5 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
What was outlined in Rae v Marrs (1957) |
Warning sign can be a complete defence if it does enough in the circumstances + unusual / extreme danger will require additional warning |
|
|
What was stated in OLA 1957 s2(4)(a) |
Warning is ineffective unless in all circumstances it was enough to enable the visitor to be reasonably safe |
|
|
What was outlined in Staples v West Dorset DC |
If danger is obvious and can be appreciated by the visitor then no additional warning necessary |
|
|
What was outlined in Westwood v Post Office (1984) |
Warning can be complete defence if does enough |
|
|
OLA 1984 S1(5) |
Occupier can discharge duty if they take reasonable steps in the cirumstanc to give warning of the danger concerned to discourage persons from incurring the risk |
