Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
8 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Strength: Judges
|
High Court judges are experts on constitutional law and its application, so are best placed to interpret its meaning
|
|
Strength: Success
|
High Court interpretation of the Constitution has had the most success in changing the law-making powers and updating them for modern use.
|
|
Strength: Guardian of the Constitution
|
The High Court is the guardian of the Constitution and can act to ensure that parliaments do not abuse their law-making powers (provided that someone has brought forward a case.)
|
|
Strength: Check and balance
|
The High Court can act as a check against any abuse of power by the states or the Commonwealth Parliament.
|
|
Weakness: Favoritism
|
High Court judges since the 1920s have generally favoured Commonwealth Parliament over state parliaments in their decisions, thereby increasing the powers of the former at the expense of the latter.
|
|
Weakness: Lack of consistency
|
The composition of the High Court can affect the interpretation given. For example, conservative judges may be reluctant to change law-making powers, but progressive judges are more inclined to do so.
|
|
Weakness: Can only hear cases brought forward to it
|
A change relies on someone being willing and able to challenge a case in the High Court, which is an expensive and time-consuming prospect. The party bringing the case must also have standing
|
|
Weakness: Section 128
|
The High Court cannot change the words in the Constitution.
|