• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/71

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

71 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Agreement Reality

“It must be true, because everyone says it is”

Experiential Reality

Your own personal experience tells you that an explanation is correct.

Tradition

We do things as we have always done them

Problem with tradition

if we only rely on past practices we are not open to newer techniques that might be better

Authority

We do what people in power say

Problem with authority

People in authority may lack important information needed to make accurate assumptions

Common Sense

We do what makes sense to us at the time

Problem with common sense

Our individual experiences may be faulty and what we think is common sense is actually ignorance

Popular Media

We make decisions based on social media

Problem with media

Media outlets want to sell information to many people. They may be biased and not interested in disseminating facts

3 characteristics of science

• It is based on systematic observations togain empirical evidence• The results can be observed by other people• Anyone can re-do the experiment if they follow identical methods and expect to get the same results

The scientific method of creating knowledge is based on

systematic observations

It’s critical that all phenomena can

be observed by other people

The phenomena that we want to understand must be

articulated specifically and in enough detail that the method used to study it can be repeated by other people

Personalbiases are

recognized and openly discussed

Eachtype of research method, “_________ vs. __________”must be used appropriately dependingupon the type of research question that is asked

positivism vs post-positivism

positivism

based on the belief that a phenomena can “positively” be understood if the research is well designed

positivism is based on

the process of deduction where the research has an idea or hypothesis, and tests it to seeif she is correct in her understanding of the phenomena

Positivisticresearchers aim to learn

what causes a phenomena. It aims to determine causality.


Positivism uses ______ research


quantitative

Quantitative research

Scientists often want to understand what the general population, or most people, believe or act like and therefore are interested in including very large groups of people as participants




Statistics make it possible to organize and understand the very large number of answers from the participants

bias in positivistic research

The researcher strives to be objective and control any biases (gender, cultural, geographic) in the design




The design is protected by anticipating what possible biases may come up and creating a plan to counteract them

Often Positivistic Quantitative Research is accused of being ______ because

superficial and depending on surveys that don’t let participants really explain how they feel or what they think.

One of the good things about quantitative research is that

answers depicting “good”, “fair”, or “poor” can be assigned numbers and the average level of health among all the participants can be determined.

post positivism

based on the idea that it is impossible to completely understand complex situations that occur in the real world, not a research laboratory

post positivism is based on ________ research

qualitative

research methods have an _____ and it needs to be

inherent bias




acknowledged

post positivism is based on

theory of induction



3 characteristics of the theory of induction

Researcher is trying to develop a hypothesis by observing what is going on




The researcher doesn’t have an hypothesis about why something is happening




Hypotheses are developed after researcher understands findings from qualitative research

In post-positivistic research, scientists want to learn a lot about

Small groups of people




Statistics aren’t usually needed to manage large amounts of data.

Quantitative Research

looking for evidence to test a hypothesis and understand WHY

Qualitative Research

We don’t have hypothesis: only questions.




Questions often begin with word “What”

Qualitative post-positivistic research

Wants to gain a deep understanding of a subject




The question you ask when you don’t have a hypothesis

Differences in qualitative vs quantitative methods

Quantitative researchers want to take precise measures to compare answers.




Qualitative researchers want to listen to stories and compare people’s experiences

Steps we take to do research (5)

1. Formulatequestions about a social work problem


2. Choose a research method depending on question


*Qualitative(if phenomena is new and youdon’t have a theory yet) Quantitative(if you have a theory)


3. Gather information about the problem


4. Formulate an answer from information


5. Draw conclusionsfrom answers

To make an informed judgement

The assimilation of knowledge and gathering of data in a logical manner to become informed

Evidence-basedpractices gather data using scientific methods to answer questions because

Our past experiences may be misleading




Knowledge of others may be wrong or biased




Traditions rely on past practices

When developing research questions keep in mind
If issue is “value-laden” or subjective

Use qualitative methods




Is question empirical? Can it be quantified?

4 characteristics of fundamental research

Empirical


Questions a scientific theory


Has scientific relevance


Basic research

3 characteristics of applied research

Solving problems having a practical application




Has social relevance




Patient-oriented research

3 characteristics of exploratory

Allows us to observe phenomena and assessthem to form theories




Explores understudied topics




Uncovers phenomena

2 characteristics of descriptive

Explains how and/or why a phenomenon occurs




“Uses numbers (how many, how much, etc.)to describe a population or phenomenon.”

Explanatory questions

“Examines relationship between 2+ factors to see if they are related and how strongly”

Evaluative questions

Draws from both qualitative and quantitative methods

single subject

Measures an individual’s progress overtime




Measure whether a relationship exists between an intervention and specific outcome




Can use either qualitative or quantitative

choose qualitative when

you want to listen to people talk and find out what they are saying in common

choose quantitative when

you want to give people a survey and compare their answers to other people’s

Qualitative is...

Developing knowledge where little exists




Uses words, observations, and descriptions to describe patterns and themes

Quantitative is...

Expands knowledge that already exists




Uses numerical data to report findings from the research

Mixed Methods

Uses both types of data collection using descriptions and numerical data

use quantitative when (4)

Assign figures to various attributes




Recode objects, organizations and people into numbers




Apply statistics to describe their interactions




Evaluate results and test assumptions that the numbers represent




Interpret “accurate” data

use qualitative when (4)

Numbers don’t give answers in enough depth




Investigates people in their environment




Subjects seen as part of a whole system




Proponents say Quantitative method doesn’t offer enough insight because questions are too narrow.

Strength means

we gain knowledge of important issues

Limitations are

Knowledge that is confined to questions we ask

Bias is

Unknown or unacknowledged error




Created during the design of the research methods




Choice of the problem




Over the course of the study itself




During the interpretation

Response to Nazi experiments

Declaration of Helsinki

3 characteristics of the Declaration of Helsinki

Ethical principles regarding experiments with humans were developed for the medical community by the World Medical Association




Cornerstone of human research ethics




Provides foundations that participants are given the option to refuse to participate without repercussions

Nuremberg Code (10)

1. Participant must be able to voluntarily consent


2. Findings are for society’s good and can’t be found another way


3. Anticipated results will justify experiment


4. Experiment must avoid unnecessary suffering 5. Can’t be conducted if death or disabling injury believed to occur


6. Risks should never be greater than benefits of study


7. Proper preparations and facilities must protect subjects


8. Conducted only by scientifically qualified persons


9. Participants must be able to stop experiment at anytime


10. Experiment must stop if continuing may result ininjury, disability, or death

Tuskegee Study Research Design

600 impoverished, African-American men who were sharecroppers enrolled




399 who had previously contracted syphilis before thestudy began; 201 didn’t have the disease.




Men were given free medical care, meals, and free burial insurance.




Study lasted 40 years and participants were never told they had syphilis, nor were they ever treated for it.

Tuskegee Syphillis Study

Recruited African American male sharecroppers with syphilis. Told they were treated for “bad blood”




Thought they were receiving free health care




Real aim was to study progression of syphilis; people were not really treated even after penicillin became common treatment




Participants were never told about Penicillin and the syphilis progressed and was fatal to many




Principle of informed consent grew from thisatrocity




Right to receive services




If experimental treatment is found to be significantly better than the control one, study should be stopped; then both groups should receive the good treatment

Effects of syphillis

Untreated, it has a mortality of 8% to 58%, with a greater death rate in males.




The symptoms of syphilis have become less severe over the 19th and 20th centuries, in part due to widespread availability of effective treatment and partly due to decreasing virulence of the spirochaete.




With early treatment, few complications result.

Belmont Report (3)

Respect for persons




Beneficence




Justice

Respect for people:

protect autonomy of all people and treat them with courtesy and respect. Researchers must be truthful and conduct no deception

Beneficence:

the philosophy of "Do no harm“




Maximize benefits for the research project and minimize risks

Justice:

requires that reasonable, non-exploitative, and well-considered procedures are administered fairly; (fair distribution of costs and benefits to potential participants)

Milgram Study

Participants told to apply stronger and stronger shocks to another participant (confederate) in the next room, when they answered a question incorrectly




Confederate acted as if they were experiencing pain,but researcher told participant to continue shocking them even when confederates screamed, groaned and some sounded as if they passed out




Participant was not told Confederate was ok until end; some participants were psychologically affected for years

Milligram Study Design

Experimenter (E) convinces the subject ("Teacher" T) to give what he believes are painful electric shocks to another subject, who is actually an actor ("Learner" L).

Principles of "Do No Harm"

Tell participant nature of study


If can’t describe in detail; debrief subjects


Benefits must outweigh risks


Benefits to society may be included as benefit Risks can include psychological risks including discomfort and bringing up unpleasant memories, feelings

Zimbardo Experiment (5)

24 male students randomly assigned to role of either prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of a psychology building.




They all agreed to participate in a 7 to 14 day period




The participants adapted to their roles




Some guards ultimately subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture.




Many prisoners became passive and incapacitated




Accepted psychological abuse




At the request of the guards, readily harassed other prisoners who resisted being abused

Confidentiality and Anonymity (4)

Subject needs to give specially constructed consent to be in a study that could potentially ruin their reputation in the community, or cause arrest




Certificate of Confidentiality




Participant can’t be deceived; needs to know in study




Researcher needs to be honest about their intent




Data need to be in locked files, with no identifying information

Informed Consent (8)

Educating subject about basic purpose of study




Describe procedures in detail




Acknowledge subject has right to refuse




Acknowledge right to withdraw during the experiment




Helping them understand all risks and benefits




Explain how their confidentiality will be maintained




Be honest about limits of confidentiality




Obtain written permission to participate