• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Modus: Upon vesting the beneficiary receives both the asset and the obligation

Van Blommenstein

Modus: "subject to the condition" refers to modus

Wessels

Constitutional restrictions: "female" & "durban" requirements retained

Emma Smith

Constitutional restrictions: Co-ed school deleted "boys"

Heydenrych

Conditions aimed at breaking up a marriage

Oosthuizen

General restraint on marriage

De Wayer v SPCA

Partial restraint on marriage

Aronson v Hart

Termination of benefit is not against public policy (2 cases)

Watling


REM v VM

Constitutional restrictions: Out and Out disinheritance (2 cases)

Harper v Crawford


King v De Jager

Class Bequests limited to those alive or conceived at delatio

Els v Els

Court allowed slight alteration to will because of changing circumstances

Sidelski

Master had to replace executor, as executor had signed the will

Giles

Conditional Revocation (2 cases)

Olivier v Master


De Reszke v Maras

Supposed revocation: testator destroys will believing previous one automatically revives

Le Roux v Le Roux

Supposed revocation: Testator destroys will, thinking it is revoked

Davis v Steel

Doctrine of dependent relative revocation is unnecessary

Raabe v Master

Vague and uncertain conditions

Ex parte Dessels

Intention to create fideicommissum

Raubenheimer

Destruction of will still is a ground for unworthiness in SA

Yassen