Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
19 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Modus: Upon vesting the beneficiary receives both the asset and the obligation |
Van Blommenstein |
|
Modus: "subject to the condition" refers to modus |
Wessels |
|
Constitutional restrictions: "female" & "durban" requirements retained |
Emma Smith |
|
Constitutional restrictions: Co-ed school deleted "boys" |
Heydenrych |
|
Conditions aimed at breaking up a marriage |
Oosthuizen |
|
General restraint on marriage |
De Wayer v SPCA |
|
Partial restraint on marriage |
Aronson v Hart |
|
Termination of benefit is not against public policy (2 cases) |
Watling REM v VM |
|
Constitutional restrictions: Out and Out disinheritance (2 cases) |
Harper v Crawford King v De Jager |
|
Class Bequests limited to those alive or conceived at delatio |
Els v Els |
|
Court allowed slight alteration to will because of changing circumstances |
Sidelski |
|
Master had to replace executor, as executor had signed the will |
Giles |
|
Conditional Revocation (2 cases) |
Olivier v Master De Reszke v Maras |
|
Supposed revocation: testator destroys will believing previous one automatically revives |
Le Roux v Le Roux |
|
Supposed revocation: Testator destroys will, thinking it is revoked |
Davis v Steel |
|
Doctrine of dependent relative revocation is unnecessary |
Raabe v Master |
|
Vague and uncertain conditions |
Ex parte Dessels |
|
Intention to create fideicommissum |
Raubenheimer |
|
Destruction of will still is a ground for unworthiness in SA |
Yassen |