• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/91

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

91 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
emergent properties of groups
those behaviors that only surface when people are in groups

ppl do things in groups that they would never do alone

ex: 49ers victory over bengals in superbowl
deindividuation
the reduced sense of individual identity accompanied by diminished self-regulation that comes over people when they are in a large group.
theoretical model of deindividuation
antecedent conditions --> internal state (deindividuation) --> behavioral effects


antecedent conditions : anonymity, diffusion of responsibility, energizing effect of others, stimulus overload

internal state : lessened self-observation and self-evaluation, lessened concern with the evaluations of others, weakening of internal controls (lessened concern with shame, guilt, fear, commitment)

behavioral effects : impulsivity, irrationality, emotionality, antisocial activity
suicide baiting
when someone is threatening to jump, and the mob encourages it.

increases with an increase in crowd size
also increases with increase in time of day (<6pm vs >6pm)
conduct of war vs deindividuation
strong correlation between deindividuation and aggressiveness in warfare
individuation
an enhanced sense of individual identity produced by focusing attention on the self, which generally leads people to act carefully and deliberately and in accordance with their sense of propriety and values
self awareness theory
a theory that maintains that when people focus their attention inward on themselves, they become concerned with self-evaluation and how their current behavior conforms to their internal standards and values
There is a (positive/negative) relationship between self-consciousness and deindividuation
negative
alcohol (increases/decreases) self-consciousness
decreases
There are many contexts in which group decisions are (better/worse) than those rendered by individuals
worse
group think
a kind of faulty thinking on the part of highly cohesive groups in which the critical scrutiny that should be devoted to the issues at hand is subverted by social pressures to reach consensus

ex: ill fated launches of space shuttles Challenger and Columbia
Antecedent conditions of Groupthink
antecedent conditions : high cohesiveness, insulation of the group, lack of procedures for information search and appraisal, directive leadership, high stress with a low degree of hope for finding a better solution than one favored by the leader or other influential people
Motivation for Groupthink
motivation: concurrence-seeking
Symptoms of Groupthink
symptoms of groupthink : illusion of invulnerability, collective rationalization, belief in inherent morality of the group, stereotypes of outgroups, direct pressure on disse
symptoms of defective decision making
incomplete survey of objectives, incomplete survey of alternatives, poor information search, failure to examine risks of preferred choices, selective bias in processing information at hand, failure to reappraise alternatives, failure to work out contingency plans
self-censorship
the tendency to withhold information or opinions in group discussions
ways to prevent groupthink
1. leader refrains from making his opinions/preferences known at the beginning
2. making sure group is not cut out from outside input
3. designating one person in group to be devil's advocate
Group think is (higher/lower) in East Asian cultures
higher
risky shift
tendency for groups to make riskier decisions than individuals would
group polarization
the tendency for group decisions to be more extreme than those made by individuals. whatever way the individuals are leaning, group discussion tends to make them lean further in that direction


net result is that group discussion tends to expose the average person to even more arguments in favor of the position that the average person was already inclined to take
social comparison theory
a theory that maintains that when there isn't an objective standard of evaluation or comprehension, people evaluate their opinions and abilities by comparing themselves to others


ex: can i dunk a basketball? all you have to do is try

however...

am i a wimp? compare your actions to other peoples' actions
Group polarization is created in part because group discussion exposes members to a (greater/lesser) number of persuasive arguments in favor of the consensus opinion than they would have thought of themselves.
greater
People from cultures that place a high value on risk are (more/less) likely to make risky decisions after group discussion than people from cultures that do not value risk are highly
more
polarization is a particularly (common/uncommon) outcome in homogeneous groups
common
propinquity
physical proximity

one thing that influences whether become friends or lovers
sociometric survey
a survey that attempts to measure the interpersonal relationships in a group of people

ex: apartment buildings - survey to see who befriended whom & how much of an impact proximity had on it

people who lived next door to one another were four times more likely to become friends

people near stairwells formed twice as many friendships with upstairs neighbors as those living in the middle apartments
functional distance
an architectural layout's tendency to encourage or inhibit certain activities, like contact between people
Three reasons why proximity leads to friendship
1. availability (simple contact)
2. tendency to be nice to those with whom we expect to have frequent encounters
3. comfort created by repeated exposure to a person
counterbalancing
a methodological procedure used to ensure that any extraneous variable that might influence the dependent measure is distributed equally across experimental conditions.

do you like person a or person b better? half ppl are told they would meet person a, half ppl are told they would meet person b

counterbalances the appeal of both ppl
mere exposure effect
the finding that repeated exposure to a stimulus (obj or person) leads to a greater liking of the stimulus

ex: Zajonc (1968) - created a stimulus set of Turkish words that were set up to be seen by his participants 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 25 times. The more times participants saw a given word, the more they assumed it referred to something good

one reason : fluency
second reason: classical conditioning. mere repeated exposure leads to attraction because it is reinforcing
fluency
the experience of ease associated with perceiving and thinking.

this is one of two reasons why the mere exposure effect occurs
interracial and interethnic couples tend to be (less/more) similar to each other in terms of their personality traits than couples of the same race and ethnicity.
more
halo effect
the common belief that attractive individuals possess a host of positive qualities beyond their physical appearance
self-fulfilling prophecy
tendency for people to act in ways that bring about the very thing they expect to happen - people who belie who believe that an attractive person possess certain desirable characteristics may act in ways that elicit those very characteristics
mere exposure effect
the finding that repeated exposure to a stimulus (obj or person) leads to a greater liking of the stimulus

ex: Zajonc (1968) - created a stimulus set of Turkish words that were set up to be seen by his participants 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 25 times. The more times participants saw a given word, the more they assumed it referred to something good

one reason : fluency
second reason: classical conditioning. mere repeated exposure leads to attraction because it is reinforcing
fluency
the experience of ease associated with perceiving and thinking.

this is one of two reasons why the mere exposure effect occurs
interracial and interethnic couples tend to be (less/more) similar to each other in terms of their personality traits than couples of the same race and ethnicity.
more
halo effect
the common belief that attractive individuals possess a host of positive qualities beyond their physical appearance
self-fulfilling prophecy
tendency for people to act in ways that bring about the very thing they expect to happen - people who belie who believe that an attractive person possess certain desirable characteristics may act in ways that elicit those very characteristics
three reasons why physical attractiveness have such impact?
immediacy
prestige
biology
immediacy (attractiveness)
beauty is seen right away, so it's our first impression of them
prestige (attractiveness)
partner's looks often matter more in public than in private
Biology (attractiveness)
all cultures share roughly the same opinions of which faces (any race) they find attractive

we have evoluved to have a preference for people possessing physical features that signify health, or, more generally, "reproductive fitness"
reproductive fitness
the capacity to get one's genes passed on to subsequent generations
social exchange theory
a theory based on the fact that there are costs and rewards in all relationships and that how people feel about a relationship depends on their assessments of its costs and rewards and the costs and rewards available to them in other relationships
equity theory
a theory that maintains that ppl are motivated to pursue fairness, or equity, in their relationships, with rewards and costs shared roughly equally among individuals
social influence
the myriad ways that ppl impact one another including changes in attitudes, beliefs, feelings, and behavior, that result from the comments, actions, or even the mere presence of others
conformity
changing one's behavior or beliefs in response to explicit or implicit pressure (whether real or imagined) from others
compliance
responding favorably to an explicit request by another person
obedience
in an unequal power relationship, submitting to the demands of the more powerful person
ideomotor action
the phenomenon whereby merely thinking about a behavior makes its actual performance more likely
what are the three types of social influence?
conformity, compliance, obedience
Three sources of conformity?
automatic, informational social influence, normative social influence
informational social influence
they view the actions of others as informative about what is best to do
normative social influence
out of concern for the social consequences of their actions
the (smaller/larger) the group size, the greater its influence
larger
__________ groups are far more effective than those with even a single other dissenter
unanimous
people from more interdependent cultures are (more/less) likely to conform than people from independent cultures
more
women are (less/more) likely to conform than men
more
the more difficult and ambiguous the task (as with the autokinetic experiment), the (greater/lesser) the conformity
greater
three task factors that affect conformity pressure
how difficult and ambiguous the task is
whether the responses are anonymous or not
when people have satisfying explanations of others' judgements, they are less affected by others' responses
__________ groups are far more effective than those with even a single other dissenter
unanimous
people from more interdependent cultures are (more/less) likely to conform than people from independent cultures
more
women are (less/more) likely to conform than men
more
the more difficult and ambiguous the task (as with the autokinetic experiment), the (greater/lesser) the conformity
greater
three task factors that affect conformity pressure
how difficult and ambiguous the task is
whether the responses are anonymous or not
when people have satisfying explanations of others' judgements, they are less affected by others' responses
characteristics of the group that affect conformity pressure
size
unanimous or dissent?
level of expertise and status of members
Stanley Milgram did many experiments on the study of _________.
obedience

most people go along with seemingly harmful commands of an authority
participants in obedience experiments are caught in a conflict between which two opposing?
normative social influence and moral imperatives. shifts toward normative social influences
compliance with the requests of others may be elicited through two types of techniques
reason-based techniques and emotion-based techniques
emotion based approaches include
getting target person in a good mood, which is likely to increase compliance because of mood maintenance and bcs of the influence of the good mood on how the request is interpreted
autokinetic illusion
the apparent motion of a stationary point of light in a completely darkened environment
informational social influence
the influence of other ppl that results from taking their comments or actions as a source of information about what is correct, proper, or effective

ex : point of light...how much did it move? ppls answers converged toward group norm when ppl share their comments & opinions
normative social influence
the influence of other ppl that comes from the desire to avoid their disapproval, harsh judgements, and other social sanctions
internalization (private acceptance)
private acceptance of a proposition, orientation, or ideology
public compliance
agreeing with someone or advancing a position in public, even if we continue to believe something else in private
minorities often do have an influence, primarily through _________ social influence
informational
norm of reciprocity
a norm dictating that people should provide benefits to those who benefit them
door in the face technique (reciprocal concessions technique)
asking someone for a very large favor that he or she will certainly refuse and then following that request with one for a more modest favor
foot in the door technique
a compliance technique in which one makes an initial small request to which nearly everyone complies, followed by a larger request involving the real behavior of interest
negative state relief hypothesis
the idea that people engage in certain actions, such as agreeing to a request, in order to relieve negative feelings and to feel better about themselves
reactance theory
the idea that people reassert their prerogatives in responses to the unpleasant state of arousal they experience when they believe their freedoms are threatened
altruism
unselfish behavior that benefits others without regard to consequences for the self
social rewards
benefits like praise, positive attention, tangible rewards, honors, and gratitude that may be gained from helping others
experienced distress
a motive for helping those in distress that may arise from a need to reduce our own distress
empathic concern
identifying with another person - feeling and understanding what that person is experiencing - accompanied by the intention to help the person in need
bystander intervention
helping a victim of an emergency by those who have observed what is happening. by stander intervention is generally reduced as the number of observers increases, as each individual feels that someone else will probably help
diffusion of responsibility
a reduction of a sense of urgency to help someone involved in an emergency or dangerous situation under the assumption that others who are also observing the situation will help
pluralistic ignorance
bystandards may do nothing if they are not sure what is happening and don't see anyone else helping
reciprocal altruism
the tendency to help others with the expectation that they are likely to help us in return at some future time.
tit for tat strategy
a strategy in which the individual's first move is cooperative and thereafter the individual mimics the other person's behavior, whether cooperative or competitive