Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
76 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is anomia?
|
word finding problems
|
|
What is alexia?
|
reading problems
|
|
What is agraphia?
|
writing problems
|
|
Where are reading and writing controlled in the brain?
|
near occipital lobe (visual)
|
|
True or false: Semantics widely distributed throughout the right hemisphere.
|
False: left hemi (ACA, PCA, MCA supplies)
|
|
Where is orthography function located in the brain?
|
extrasylvian region (PCA supplies)
|
|
Where is phonology and syntax located in the brain?
|
perisylvian region (MCA supplies)
|
|
What is semantic paraphasia?
|
person substitutes semantically-related word for target word (e.g., desk for table)
|
|
What is phonological paraphasia?
|
person substitutes words that share similar phonetics (e.g., mable for table)
|
|
What is jargon paraphasia?
|
word generated is not a real word; more than half of word does not relate to target word; neologisms (e.g., faper for table)
|
|
What could go wrong if there was a lesion in the semantic region (perisylvian and/or extrasylvian region)?
|
-lose meaning info, but may access some semantic info so they come up with a related word
-anomia: say wrong word when shown pic -agraphia: may or may not write regular, irregular, and nonwords to dictation depending on extent of other damage; cannot write words when shown pic -alexia: may or may not read regular, irregular, and nonwords depending on extent of other and nonwords depending on extent of other damage; cannot associate read words with meaning - reading without comprehension |
|
What could go wrong if there was a lesion in the phonology and orthography region (perisylvian and/or extrasylvian lesion)?
|
-anomia: circumlocute when shown pic
-agraphia: may or may not write regular, irregular, and nonwords to dictation depending on extent of other damage; cannot write words when shown pics -alexia: may or may not read regular and nonwords depending on extent of other damage; cannot read irregular words or associate read words with meaning- reading without comprehension |
|
What would impaired phonology area look like? (perisylvian lesion)
|
-anomia: will produce jargon when shown a pic
-phonological/deep agraphia -phonological/deep alexia |
|
What can go wrong with a lesion in the orthography region? (extrasylvian lesion)
|
-no anomia: will say word correctly when shown a pic
-lexical/surface agraphia: cannot write irregular word correctly to dictation or when shown a pic -lexical/surface alexia: cannot read irregular words; reading is better than spelling overall, but worse nonword reading than spelling |
|
What is phonological/deep agraphia?
|
-regular nonwords will be incorrect and phonologically implausible
-regular and irregular words will be correct -spoken anomia- written language may be better preserved than spoken language |
|
What is phonological/deep alexia?
|
-regular nonwords will incorrect
-regular and irregular words will be correct (shows reliance on lexical reading procedures) |
|
What is lexical/surface agraphia?
|
-regular words and regular nonwords will be correct
-irregular words will be incorrect but phonologically plausible (shows reliance on phonological spelling procedures--eg. funnel=funal; wrath=rath) |
|
True or false: People with aphasia typically have problems with anomia, alexia, AND agraphia. Rare to have problems in just 1 or 2 areas.
|
True
|
|
What is alexia without agraphia?
|
trouble reading but can write just fine. can tell you what they wrote if you ask them right after because of memory
(rare) |
|
True or false: You must administer aphasia tests to protocol.
|
False: get to break the rules when giving standardized tests to aphasics
|
|
What are the goals of aphasia assessment?
|
-diagnose communication impairment
-differentially diagnose type of impairment (eg., aphasia, dementia, dysarthria, apraxia) -determine severity *-determine prognosis for recovery -identify strengths and deficits -plan tx -monitor improvements |
|
True or false: Screenings are not common for aphasia.
|
True
|
|
What communication skills do you assess?
|
-language
-cognition -speech -swallowing -hearing -communication interaction |
|
What is lability?
|
exaggerated emotional responses that are more extreme than the situation warrants
|
|
What is the FIM score?
|
-Functional Independent Measure score
-has to be reported within 72 hrs of admission -score ranges from 1 (dependent) to 7 (dependent) |
|
What is a battery?
|
a whole bunch of sub-tests that assess multiple modalities
|
|
Describe the BDAE.
|
-Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination
-1-4 hrs to admin.; 30-45mins short form -based on Boston Classification System -norm referenced -battery |
|
Describe the BASA.
|
-Boston Assessment of Severe Aphasia
-battery (sometimes) -30-40mins to admin. -normed for severe or global aphasia -score gestural and verbal responses -more functional assessment (personal info related to individual) |
|
Describe the WAB.
|
-Western Aphasia Battery
-battery -1-2hrs to admin. -based on Boston Classification System -score correlate with BDAE -calculate aphasia quotient (out of 100) and cortical quotient -norms for scores and type of aphasia -common in NE *only test that gives you a score (aphasia quotient) |
|
What problem is there for the WAB scores?
|
Broca's score is lower than Wernicke's (doesn't work for continuum)
|
|
Describe the PICA.
|
-Porch Index of Communicative Ability
-1hr to admin. *special scoring (requires intensive training to admin and score-- multiple categories of responses-- poor interjudge reliability) -18 subtests assess language by modality -norm referenced *Hope slope (predictive recovery scale) -not used often |
|
Describe the CADL.
|
-Communicative Abilities in Daily Living
-battery (sometimes) -45mins to admin. -norm referenced -functional tasks -score by success of communication -doesn't have different subtests that assess different modalities -gives situations that person can respond to with any modalities -more of a pragmatic and functional assessment (role playing situations) |
|
Describe the ALPS.
|
-Aphasia Language Performance Scales
-Battery? (screening) -20 mins to admin. -screening measure for multiple modalities (typically don't give screening tests for aphasia) |
|
What is a specialty test?
|
assess greater detail of one modality
|
|
Describe the RTT.
|
-Revised Token Test
-specialty test -test of auditory comprehension/memory and/or attention, processing -tokens are different colors, sizes, and shapes -test arranged in increasing difficulty levels -10 subtests, 10 commands each -not normed -sometimes done in reverse and called an expressive test (reporter's test) |
|
Describe the TROG.
|
-Test for the Reception of Grammar
-10-20 mins to admin. -assesses increasing levels of grammatical difficulty -normed ages 4-adult |
|
Describe the RCBA.
|
-Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia
-specialty test -assesses reading comprehension -silent/oral reading -30 mins to admin. -7 additional tests |
|
Describe the BNT.
|
-Boston Naming Test
-specialty test -15-30 mins to admin (easy) -normed on children 5:5-10:5yrs; normal adults and adults with aphasia -assesses word finding abilities and affect of semantic and phonemic cues (naming) -now part of BDAE, but can be a stand-alone test -all nouns -poor normative data |
|
The effect of aphasia therapy beginning in the _______ stage of recovery is nearly twice as great as the effect of ________ recovery alone.
|
acute; spontaneous
|
|
Why does aphasia tx work?
|
-spontaneous recovery (regression of diaschisis)
-brain plasticity -alterative hemi theory of recovery -substitution of non-language based communication system |
|
When does the most spontaneous recovery occur?
|
with first 2 months post-stroke (occlusive)
|
|
There is a delayed period of spontaneous recovery for people who have what type of stroke?
|
hemorrhagic stroke
|
|
How long does spontaneous recovery continue for post-stroke?
|
6 months (insurance companies)
1-2 yrs (rehab professionals) |
|
What is spontaneous recovery also known as?
|
regression of diaschsis
|
|
What is diaschisis?
|
loss or decrease of function that is observable in early periods of recovery and that involves structurally unaffected brain regions connected directly to damaged areas
|
|
What is the alternate hemi theory of recovery?
|
-corresponding structures in the non-dominant hemi take over language functions when the dominant hemi is damaged
-right hemi does not operate in same manner, so language functioning differs |
|
What is brain plasticity?
|
-multiple parts of the brain can perform a specific function (tho one region tends to dominate when no damage exists)
|
|
True or false: Language and thought are 2 separate processes.
|
True
|
|
What do you focus your treatment on for the restoration model?
|
-stimulation-facilitation
-modality -linguistic -processing -minor hemi (combo of restoration and compensation model) |
|
What do you focus your tx on for the compensation model?
|
-minor hemi (combo of restoration and compensation model)
-functional communication |
|
How do you do aphasia therapy?
|
-deficit reduction
-compensatory tx -communication facilitation -pharmacological tx |
|
What is deficit reduction?
|
-traditional aphasia tx
-process-oriented approach -relies on drill and practice routines -most recent advances involve 2 approaches |
|
What are the different types of drill and practice?
|
-word retrieval drills
-auditory comprehension drills -yes/no reliability -social interaction drills -reading/writing -producing words, phrases, and sentences -syntactic structures -constraint induced therapy |
|
Describe word retrieval drills.
|
-drill and practice tx
-confrontation naming of core pics -naming family members |
|
Describe auditory comprehension drills.
|
-drill and practice tx
-answering yes/no questions -following one-step commands -receptive naming -functional naming -conversations -tv/radio programs |
|
Describe yes/no reliability.
|
-drill and practice tx
-using head nods/shakes -pointing to written words -verbalizing yes/no |
|
Describe social interaction drills.
|
-drill and practice tx
-greetings/closings -social politeness forms -scripts |
|
Describe reading/writing drill and practice.
|
-single words
-functional items (signature, universal signs/symbols, etc.) -reading and writing social cards/letters -reading newspapers, recipes, books, etc. |
|
Describe producing words, phrases, and sentences tx.
|
-drill and practice tx
-sentence completion tasks -phrase- and sentence-length responses to questions |
|
Describe syntactic structures tx.
|
-drill and practice tx
-directly teach "who did what whom" in selected syntactic structure -teach complex structures and generalization will take care of easier structures -if you work on the hardest structures, the easier ones will come automatically |
|
Describe constraint-induced language therapy.
|
-drill and practice tx
-not effective -ethical? -constrain person from communicating in alternative means |
|
List compensatory tx's.
|
-MIT
-communication boards and notebooks -CVIC -MossTalk -writing words or letters -drawing pictures |
|
What is MIT?
|
-Melodic Intonation Therapy
-compensatory tx -pair spoken phrase/sentence with a melodic tune (usually 2 pitches) -hum then add words -best for those with good comp., mild aphasia and apraxia -generalization? |
|
What is CVIC?
|
-compensatory tx
-Lingraphica -"language in a box" -effective? -still language (aphasics don't have language!) -requires hours and hours of therapy |
|
What types of speech and language groups are there for aphasia?
|
-direct
-indirect -sociolinguistic -transition -maintenance |
|
What types of communicators are there for partner-dependents?
|
-emerging
-contextual choice -transitional |
|
What types of independent communicators are there?
|
-stored message
-generative -specific needs |
|
How does the Boston differ from the Garrett and Lasker?
|
-Boston: modalities; for those with aphasia; how severe?
-Garrett and Lasker: not widely known; communicative interactions (modalities don't matter); not just for people with aphasia (for partner-dependent communicators) |
|
Describe emerging communicators.
|
-for global aphasia
-require maximal assistance -contextual awareness -no initiation or repetition of verbalizations -messages carry no meaning |
|
What are emerging communicator intervention goals?
|
-develop turn-taking (non-verbals)
-develop choice-making ability (concrete, binary choice) -develop referential skills -develop clear signals for agreement and rejection -teach partners to provide appropriate opportunities for above |
|
What is partner training for emerging communicators?
|
-develop contextual routines
-create scrapbook/remnant photo book (some phrases--very simple) -provide contingent feedback (referential, joint attention, affirmation, rejections) -augmented input |
|
What are some augmented input strategies to use for aphasics?
|
-writing key words on paper
-gesturing symbolically -gesturing deictically (pointing) -pantomiming |
|
Describe contextual choice communicators.
|
-cannot consistently initiate communication acts
-retains skills in automatic/familiar activities (waving, nodding,..) -persistent global aphasia, expressive aphasia, or receptive aphasia -minimal output |
|
What are intervention goals for contextual choice communicators?
|
-to call for attention and/or assistance
-to introduce self in structured situation -to communicate specific and biographical info by pointing to written choices -to communicate opinions/preferences by pointing to qualitative rating scale -develop use of AAC strategies -teach both patients and partners to participate in these exchanges |
|
What is the primary communication strategy for contextual choice communicators?
|
written choice
|
|
Describe traditional communicators.
|
-retains a variety of fragments of communication skills
-attempts to communicate, including via natural speech -uses multiple modalities -usually expressive or conduction aphasia -initiates communication with minimal cues |