• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Hobson vs. Hanson, 1967
TRACKING violation of equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment
Tracking based on IQ unconstitutional and discriminates against SES and African-American students
Debra P. vs. Turlington, 1983
10 black students failed FL competency test
Ruling: Can deny diploma to students that didn't pass; students can receive certificate of completion
Established (1) ADEQUATE NOTICE (2) CURRICULAR VALIDITY
Guadalupe Organization, Inc. vs. Tempe School District, 1972
Students cannot be identified MR unless properly assess by considering primary language AND were at least 2 SD below the mean
Other assessments must be used
Parent permission must be obtained for placement
Brown vs. Board of Education, 1954
Reversed Plessy vs. Ferguson (separate but equal)
Anti-segregation law
Educational facilities cannot segregate according to race
Violated the 14th amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
Diana vs. State Board of Education, 1970
Mexican students in CA were being labeled MR
Assessments must be administered in NATIVE language of student
PARC vs. Commonwealth of PA, 1971
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children
Education is a PROPERTY RIGHT, and as a result, students cannot be excluded from FAPE
Prior to law, PA did not educate handicapped
PASE vs. Hannon, 1980
Parents in Action for Special Education
Endorsed use of standardized tests IF they are culturally sensitive and used with other measures
The use of IQ tests for black students in EMH was NOT discriminatory
Tinker vs. Des Moines, 1969
1st Amendment (FREE SPEECH clause)
Students wore armbands to protest Vietnam war.
Okay to wear does not violate others
School violated 14th Amendement (Due process clause)
Marshall vs. Georgia, 1984
The % of minority students in special education MAY exceed the % of minority students in the school population if appropriate and proper steps were taken
Overrules Larry P. vs. Riles
Lau vs. Nichols, 1974
Chinese American studetns received instruction in English only
Violated Civil Rights Act and 14th Amendment
Schools must provide accomodations (Bilingual Education) for ELL Students
Honig vs. Doe, 1988
Students in special education must have MANIFESTATION HEARING to review placement IF SUSPENDED FOR MORE THAN 10 DAYS
If more than 10 days, triggers DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT
"Stay put" rights
Pesce vs. J. Sterling Morton High School, 1987
HS school psychologist did not report abuse by teacher to student or suicidal statements in timely manner
Ruled in favor of school that suspended SP
Rowley vs. Board of Education, 1982
Deaf student, parent wanted interpreter
Public schools do not have to provide the BEST education, just an adequate education
Tarasoff vs. The Regents of the University of California, 1976
Duty to Warn
Duty to Protect
Larry P. vs. Riles, 1970
Overrepresentation of minorities classified MR
Percentage of minority students placed in special ed classrooms cannot exceed the percentage in population
No IQ testing in CA for minorities unless for GT program
OVERRULED BY MARSHALL VS. GEORGIA