• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

The case of Rylands v Fletcher

Defendants: Mill owners, engaged contractors to build a reservoir.




It was built over a mine shaft, causing it to collapse and flooding plaintiff's mine.




Plaintiff failed in nuisance, negligence, trespass(lacked continuity, not liable for contractor, not direct impact)




Still succeeded

Elements of Rylands v Fletcher

Strict liability if you can prove:




Non-natural use of property


Accumulation of something


Escape


Damage


Lack of defence

Non-natural use

-Must be capable of causing injury if it escapes. Escape does not have to be foreseeable, just potential for causing injury. Lord Goff in Cambridge Water Co. v Eastern Counties Leather plc




-Use in ordinary domestic quantities not unusual- Miller v Addie & Sons. Once it's amassed in commercial quantities it qualifies.




Rickards v Lothiam. Natural if beneficial to the community. Criticised in Cambridge.

Accumulation or collection onto property

Must have been brought, not something which naturally occurs on the land- Healy v Bray




However, rocks exploded by dynamite are included- Miles v Forest Rock Granite Co

Escape

Must be from a place of defendant's control to a place outside their control. Read v J. Lyons




Doesn't have to be an escape from land- Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire

Damage

Only situation where damage is not needed is where a preventative injunction is sought.




Non-occupier can recover in Ireland- Healy v Bray UDC




In England, you can't recover for personal injury: Transco v Stockport MBC




In Ireland, you can: Hanrahan v Merck Sharpe & Dohme

Defences

Act of a Stranger: Beutler v Beutler. Defendant may still be liable in negligence: Goldman v Hargrave




Act of God: Once-in-20-years rainfall doesn't constitute AOG. Need more. Dockeray v Manor Park Homebuilders Ltd.




Statutory Authority




Consent of the Plaintiff: Only action is in negligence. Occurs where danger gives rise to common benefit. Victor Weston Ltd v Kenny

Moving towards negligence or nuisance?

Nuisance: Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather




Negligence:Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd