Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
26 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Deductive Argument
|
Theory is an explanation of phenomena that is tested by examining hypotheses
|
|
Inductive Argument
|
Focus is on analyzing distinct phenomena that co-occur to identify the underlying causal factor
|
|
Scientific Argument
|
Convince/Persuade
Other points of view consider open-mided to contradiction collegial relationship engage in conversation |
|
How Inductive and Deductive Reasoning work together
|
Theories developed inductively
Hypotheses test Theories deductively |
|
Deductive Argument
|
Theory is an explanation of phenomena that is tested by examining hypotheses
|
|
Inductive Argument
|
Focus is on analyzing distinct phenomena that co-occur to identify the underlying causal factor
|
|
Scientific Argument
|
Convince/Persuade
Other points of view consider open-mided to contradiction collegial relationship engage in conversation |
|
How Inductive and Deductive Reasoning work together
|
Theories developed inductively
Hypotheses test Theories deductively |
|
Strong Inference
|
Test Several competing hyptheses that are mutually exclusive
Devise a crucial experiment (can prove or disprove) Hypothesis with most support becomes starting point for next |
|
Analogical Reasoning
|
If 2 things are similar to eachother in some respects they will probably be different in others
Specific to Specific |
|
Unexpected Findings
|
50% of the time
New starting point for successful researchers Unsuccessful researchers engage in confirmation bias |
|
Distributed Reasoning
|
Together as a research team to develop your theory
Diversity of skills and abilities leads to better outcomes No competing goals or domination by one member |
|
Abductive Reasoning
|
Observe and study research issue
look for patterns in observations to create theory generate competing hypotheses Experimentally test hypotheses "Inference to best explanation" |
|
Biased Thinking
|
Confirmation Bias
Assimilations Bias Reification Correlation is not causation |
|
Ineffective Arguments
|
Ad Hominem
StrawMan Appeals to Authority or Tradition Appeals to Emotion or Intuition |
|
Two Groups
|
Olympia Academy - Einstein
Inklings - Tolkan and C.S. Lewis |
|
Draft Writing
|
Madman
Architect Engineer Communicator |
|
Introduce Research Issue 1
|
Establish Importance
What is known Key Concepts Uknown about topic |
|
Goals for Inroduction
|
Establish topic is worth study
Establish need for more study |
|
State Theoretical Exlanation
|
State proposed theory
Explain how your theory logically accounts for what is unknown |
|
Review Related Research
|
Each Paragraph addresses one major point in your argument
supporting sentences for topic sentence |
|
Literature Review
|
Establish your theory is logical
Set stage for Hypothesis Overview of Area |
|
Introduce Current Study and Hypotheses
|
Next logical step to take in research
Introduce study with operational definitions |
|
Revising and Editing your Writing
|
1. Paragraph level
- topic sentence and supporting sentences 2. Paragraph structure 3. Sentence Level |
|
Working as a Team
|
Forming
Storming Norming Performing |
|
Confict Resolution
|
Use Positive and Negative Feedback
|