• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/43

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

43 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Types of Conformity

Compliance - conforming to gain approval




Internalisation - conforming because of an acceptance of their views




Identification - accepting influence because of a desire to be associated with a group

Explanations for Conformity

Normative Social Influence - based on a desire for approval




Informational Social Influence - based on an acceptance of information from others as evidence about reality

Asch 1956

Lines of varying length, 5 confeds 1 participant, confeds wrong on 12/18




Conformity Rate - 33% with confeds, 1% without




"Child of it's Time", independent behaviour not conformity

Stanford Prison Experiment

Male students assigned either guard or prisoner, prisoners referred to by number, guards can make rules and have power




Guards became tyrannical and abusive, prisoners were submissive




Conformity to Roles isn't automatic, very unethical, strong demand characteristics

Milgram Study

40 volunteers, teacher and learner(confed), teacher gave shocks for wrong answers




65% went to 450v in voice feedback




Proximity, Location, Power of the Uniform




Unethical, Low internal validity, no gender difference

Explanations for Obidience

The Agentic State - a person acts as an agent to carry out another's wishes




Legitimate Authority - Person must perceive an individual in a position of social control




Agentic state or cruelty, legitimacy can serve as the basis for justifying harm to others

The Authoritarian Personality

20 'obedient' & 'defiant' participants, MMPI and F-scale test




Little difference in MMPI but higher F-scale score for obedient participants




Lacks flexibility, f-scale suggests bad parent relations but this isn't true

Resistance to Social Influence

Social Support - breaks the unanimity




Internal Locus of Control - less reliant on others


External Locus of Control - acceptance of outside influences




LOC = normative not informational, support doesn't have to be valid to be effective

Minority Influence

Must be consistent, committed and flexible




Wood et al. - minorities who were especially consistent were most influencial




Flexibility more effective than rigid arguements

Moscovici et al. 1969

4 participants and 2 confeds, shown blue slides but confeds called them green, one group was consistent and the other wasn't




The consistent group had a conformity rate of 8%, inconsistent group had little influence




Minority 'opens the mind', Xie et al. 10% of people needed to 'tip' the majority

Social Change

Minority Influence - attention to an issue, more influential when they are consistent, causes a split within the majority, leads to the snowball effect




Majority Influence - If something is perceived as the norm people will alter their behaviour, corrects misconceptions about 'actual' norms

Caregiver-Infant Interactons

Reciprocity - taking turns as in a conversation


Interactional Synchrony - coordinated behaviour




Testing infant behaviour is hard as they are in constant motion, intentional - no response to an inanimate object

Development of Attachment

Stage 1: indiscriminate attachments


Stage 2: beginnings of attachment


Stage 3: specific attachment


Stage 4: multiple attachments




Men can be primary caregiver but it will most likely be the mother, biased sample as all working class from 1960's

Lorenz 1935

Goose eggs incubated so they either saw their mother or Lorenz first




Goslings imprinted on Lorenz and followed him, imprinting doesn't happen after the critical period, it's irreversible and related to mate choice

Harlow 1959

2 wire mothers, one cloth mother and one feeding mother




Monkeys spent most time with the cloth mother, the attachment must be formed within 6 months




All motherless monkeys were socially abnormal

Learning Theory

All behaviours are learned




Classical: new conditioned response learned through association of neutral stimulus with the unconditioned stimulus


Operant: the reduction of discomfort of hunger is rewarding so food becomes a primary reinforcer




Lacks external validity as it's simplified, attachment isn't based on food

Bowlby's Monotropic Theory 1969

Attachments form around 3-6 months, primary attachment figure is determined by sensitivity, monotropic as the primary attachment has a special emotional role, internal working model of how to form relationships (continuity hypothesis)




Attachment is adaptive, a sensitive period rather than a critical one, multiple attachments can form

Ainsworth's Strange Situation 1971,1978

Systematic test of attachment to one caregiver, observations every 15 seconds, behaviours assessed, filtered into 3 types of attachment:


Secure


Insecure Avoidant


Insecure Resistant




High reliablity due to inter-observer checks, real world applications

Cultural Variations

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg did a meta-analysis of 32 studies from 8 countries




Secure attachment was the norm in all, the biggest variation was within the country rather than between countries




Cultural difference within a country rural vs. urban, uses tools developed in one country in a different setting where it has a different meaning

Bowlby's Maternal Deprivation Theory

Children need a warm and intimate relationship with a mother or mother replacement, frequent or prolonged separations from a mother will have a negative effect before the age of 2 1/2, could lead to depression

Bowlby 1951, 1953

Bowlby did a study in 44 juvenile thieves, he found that 86% of affectionless thieves had frequent seperations before the age of 2 compared to 2% of the control group



Emotional rather than physical separation is harmful, support for long term effects

Rutter et al. 2010

Study into 165 Romanian orphans in physical, cognitive and social development tests




At age 11 those children adopted before 6 months showed good recovery




Some children appeared to recover despite no apparent attachments within the sensitive period

Hazan and Shaver 1987

Placed a 'Love Quiz' in a newspaper and got 620 responses




There was a positive relationship between attachment type and love experiences in adult life (internal working model)




Retrospective meaning that it could be inaccurate, overly determinist

Abnormality

Statistical Infrequency - the extreme ends determine what's not the norm


Deviation from Social Norms - standards of what is acceptable


Failure to Function Adequately - being unable to manage everyday life


Deviation from Ideal Mental Health - Jahoda identified characteristics commonly used to describe competent people

Phobias, Depression and OCD

Emotional - excessive fear, anxiety and/or panic


Behavioural - avoidance, faint or freeze


Cognitive - not helped by rational arguement




Emotional - negative emotions


Behavioural - reduced or increased activity


Cognitive - irrational, negative thinking




Emotional - anxiety and distress


Behavioural - compulsive behaviours


Cognitive - recurrent, uncontrollable thoughts

Behaviourist Approach for Explaining Phobias

Two Process Model:


Classical Conditioning - phobia learned through association between NS & UCS


Operant Conditioning - phobia maintained through negative reinforcement




People often report one incident that caused a phobia, not everyone bitten by a dog becomes afraid of dogs (diathesis-stress model)

Systematic Desensitisation & Flooding

SD - counter-conditioning, relaxation and a desensitisation hierarchy


75% success rate, not for all phobias, self done




Flooding - one long session, continues until anxiety subsides


Can be very traumatic, can be more effective than SD as a treatment

Cognitive Approach to Explaining Depression

Ellis' ABC model - Activation event->irrational Beliefs->Consequences




Beck's Negative Triad - bad schema develops in childhood, negative views of the SELF, FUTURE and WORLD




Support of irrational thinking, blames the client and ignores situational factors

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Ellis' ABCDEF model:


D - disputing irrational beliefs


E & F - effects of disputing and feelings produced




Behavioural activation - encouraging re-engagement with pleasurable activities




90% success rate over 27 sessions, CBT isn't for everyone (people who's stressors can't be changed)

Biological Approach to Explaining OCD

COMPT gene - creates high levels of dopamine


SERT gene - creates low levels of serotonin


Diathesis-stress - genes create a vunerability




High Dopamine - linked to compulsive behaviour


Low Serotonin - antidepressants that increase serotonin levels most effective


Worry circuit - damaged caudate nucleus doesn't suppress worry signals




Genes aren't specific to OCD, twin studies 2x more likely

Treating OCD

Antidepressants increase serotonin levels


SSRIs - prevent re-uptake of serotonin by pre-synaptic neuron


Tricyclics - block reuptake of noradrenaline and serotonin


Anti-anxiety drugs - enhances GABA which slows the nervous system




SSRIs are more effective than a placebo, drug therapies are preferred as they require little effort and time

The Origins of Psychology

Wundt:


Psychology is a science


Breaking down behaviour into basic parts


Introspection was his method of choice


Gained general ideas about mental processes




Psychology uses empirical methods


Replications can leads to results being accepted as true


Also requires the development of theories

The Behaviourist Approach

Classical Conditioning - can be used to treat anxiety and other such conditions, different species have different capabilities of learning using CC




Operant Conditioning - this relies on the experimental method which lends support to 'psychology as a science' argument, most research was done on non-human animals thus excluding free will

Social Learning Theory

Bandura (1986) - children observed aggressive or non-aggressive models interacting with Bobo doll, children where then allowed to interact with the doll




Children who observed the aggressive model acted aggressively towards the doll




This lead to an understanding of criminal behaviour, SLT disregards outside influences

The Cognitive Approach

Mental processes must be inferred, schemas help to organise and interpret information, neuroimaging can be used to study the brain




Cognitive approach is scientific which supports the 'psychology as a science' argument, the cognitive approach ignores emotion and motivation levels

The Biological Approach

Genes carry information for a characteristics, nervous systems: central & peripheral, excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters




Biological approach uses the scientific method and produces clear predictions to be tested, it is very reductionist and simplified

The Experimental Method

Aims clearly stated, the hypothesis states the relationship between the IV and the DV, causal conclusions can be drawn

Control of Variables

Confounding variables - vary systematically with the IV meaning they could affect the DV


Extraneous variables - nuisance variables and make harder to detect change in the DV




Validity = legitimacy, genuineness


Internal Validity - enhanced by controlling the confounding variables


External Validity - generalising to other situations, people and historical periods



Hypothesis

Directional = states whether it will be more or less




State direction if indicated by past research

Sampling

Small group of people selected from a population




Opportunity - recruit those easily available


Random - use a random technique


Stratified - identify relevant subgroups


Systematic - select every nth person


Volunteer - people respond to an advert

Ethical Issues

Researcher PoV:


Informed Consent - may give away the aims


Deception - acceptable when information is withheld


The Right to Withdraw - biases the sample


Protection from Harm - difficult to guarantee


Confidentiality - publishing results may lead to identity


Privacy - hard to protect




Participant PoV:


Informed consent - basic human right


Deception - prevents from informed consent


The Right to Withdraw - compensates deception


Protection from Harm - risks no higher than normal life


Confidentiality - a legal right


Privacy - may not want to be observed

Dealing with Issues

Ethical Guidelines - tell you what's acceptable


Ethics Committees - approve studies or reject them


Punishment - may bar psychologist from work




Informed consent - sign a form


Deception - debriefing


The Right to Withdraw - part of informed consent


Protection from Harm - stop the study


Confidentiality - maintain anonymity


Privacy - only acceptable in public places

Experiment Types

Laboratory - study with an IV and a DV conducted in a controlled environment




Field - study with an IV and DV conducted in a more natural environment




Natural - the IV is varied whether the researcher is there or not and the DV is measured in a lab




Quasi - the IV isn't a variable, it's a condition