Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Three distinct categories was led down in |
Wlikinson v Downton 1) they lead to physical injury and this leads to psychiatric 2) primary 3 secondary |
|
First case getting successful remedy |
Delieu v white A pregnant woman behind the bar, and where she was badly frightened by voice od horses |
|
White case |
Defined the difference btween both the victim's |
|
Definition of primary victim led down in |
Page v Smith If physical injury is forseeable a doc is owed then whether there is psychiatric injury is forseeable or not! |
|
Simmons McFarlane |
Workers working on a mining field owe a DoC The fear must be objectively dangerous |
|
Alcock v chief constable of west Yorkshire |
Shock involves sudden appreciation by sight or sound of a horrific event which agitates the mind' |
|
Immediate aftermath |
Galii Atkinson v Segal CoA allowed a claim of mother whom witnessed the even after the removal of the body of her daughter and then in mortgage was connectin factor whereas in "Crystal Taylor v A novo" claim was failed bc of multiple events |
|
Recognable illnesses resulting from shock |
Butchart case Two prison (one is suicidal) |
|
The means by which shock is caused |
Sion v Hampstead heath authority (Father stayed beside his son's bedside for 14 days watching him dead, time requirements not satisfied!! North Glamorgan NHS trust v Walters,: A mother faced psychiatric harm as a result of event she witnessed over the 48 hours |
|
Lord Akner on Alcock case |
Involves the sudden appreciation by sight or sound of a horrific event whoch violently agitates the mind |
|
Rescue cases |
White (they could bring claim if they themselves are at risk of phy injury) Alcock (no proximity of relationship) |
|
Proximity in time and space |
McLouglin case Mrs M saw relatives in the same state after the incident, allowed the recovery |
|
Attia v British Gas |
Were allowed for the recovery on property causing psychiatric |
|
Greatorex v greatorex |
No liable if the negligence was of your own |
|
Employees |
Walker v Northumberland county council The special rules that apply generally to employees who suffer psychiatric damage as a result of an unsafe system of work are also relevant |