• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/93

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

93 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

A priori method

- what came before


- use of reason and a developing consensus among those debating the merits of one belief over another


- logic is used by both sides to come to opposite conclusions, but the logic in both cases is correct

Empiricism

the process of learning through direct observation or experience, and reflection on those experiences

Belief perseverance

motivated by a desire to be certain about one's knowledge, it is a tendency to hold on to a belief even in the face of evidence to the contrary

Confirmation Bias

a tendency to search out and pay special attention to information that supports one's beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts a belief

Availability Heuristic

occurs when we experience unusual, emotional, or memorable events, and then overestimate how often such events typically occur

Determinism

Events (including psychological ones) have causes

Statistical Determinism

an assumption made by research psychologist that behavioral events can be predicted with a probability greater than chance

Strict determinism

enables prediction of events with 100% certainty

Discoverability

The causes of events can be known, through scientific methods, with some degree of confidence

Objective Observations

One that can be verified by more than one observer

One that can be verified by more than one observer

Introspection

- precise self-report


- part of everyday cognition of early psychologists


- problem: subjective

data-driven

- it is expected that conclusions about behaviors will be supported by the evidence of the objective info gathered through some systematic procedure

Empirical Questions

answerable questions: questions that can be answered through objective, systematic observations, together with scientific techniques and methods

Hypothesis

a prediction about the study's outcome; often it is a logical deduction from a theory

Theory

a set of statements that summarize what is known about some phenomena and propose working explanations for those phenomena


- a good theory must be precise enough so that it can be disproven

Falsification

-research strategy that emphasizes putting theories to the test by trying to disprove or falsify them

pseudoscience

any form of inquiry that appears to use scientific methods and tries hard to give that impression, but is actually based on inadequate, unscientific methods and makes claims that are generally false

anecdotal evidence

- has immediate appeal to the uncritical reader


- problem: it is selective: examples that don't fit are ignored

effort justification

the idea that after people expend significant effort, they feel compelled to convince themselves that the effort was worthwhile

Laws

regular and predictable relationships existing between variables

prediction

behavior follows laws

explanation

to explain some behavior is to know what caused it to happen

application

various ways of applying psychological principles to change people's lives for the better

critical incidence

method, used by ethics committees, that surveys psychologists and asks for examples of unethical behavior by psychologists

ethics

a set of standards governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession

IRB

- Institutional Review Board


- reviews and approves research from the standpoint of research

debriefing

a post-experimental session in which the researcher explains the study's purpose, reduces any discomfort felt by participants, and answers any questions posed by participants

leakage

- participants talking to other potential participants

dehoaxing

that portion of a debriefing in which the true purpose of the study is explained to the participants

desensitization

that part of the debriefing during which the researcher tries to reduce any distress felt by participants as a result of their research experience and are informed that they may have their data removed from the data set, if they so desire

risk

depends on the degree to which people being studied find themselves in situations similar to those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests

informed consent

the idea that persons should be given sufficient information about a study to make their decision to participate as a research subject an informed and voluntary one

assent

if the participants are children, informed consent must be provided by their parents, but the researchers are also required to explain the research to the child and to obtain their agreement to participate

plagiarism

claiming as your own another's words, language, ideas or work

basic research

- investigates the fundamental principles of behavior and mental processes


- designed to understand fundamental psychological phenomena

applied research

- has direct and immediate relevance to the solution of real-world problems


- designed to shed light on the solution to real-world problems

laboratory research

- research that occurs within the controlled confines of a research laboratory


- minimal mundane reallism


- often basic research


field research

- research that occurs in any location outside the laboratory


- maximum mundane realism


- often applied research

mundane realism

how closely an experiment mirrors real-life experiences

experimental realism

the extent to which a research study has an impact on the subjects, forces them to take the matter seriously and involves them in the procedures

quantitative research

data are collected and presented in the form of numbers

qualitative research

results presented as analytical narratives that summarize the findings

operational definitions

procedures that define and measure a construct

converging operations

series of investigations using slightly different operational definitions all support the same conclusions, increasing understanding and confidence

serendipity

act of discovering something while looking for something else entirely

construct

a hypothetical factor that is not directly observed, but is inferred from certain behaviors and assumed to follow from certain circumstances

deduction

reasoning from a set of general statements toward the prediction of some specific event


(reasoning from general to specific)


(theory to data)

induction

the logical process of reasoning from specific events to the general


(reasoning from specific to general)


(data to theory)

productivity

good theories advance knowledge by generating a great deal of research

parsimony

theories should include the minimum number of constructs and assumptions that are necessary to explain the phenomena adequately and predict future research outcomes


- simplest explanation is generally preferred

pilot studies

trial runs of a possible idea for an experiment

replication

a study that duplicated some or all of a precious study, hoping to confirm or fail to confirm the previous findings

extension

resembles a prior study and usually replicated part of it, but goes father and adds at least one new feature

creative thinking

a process of making an innovative connection between seemingly unrelated ideas or events

reliability

a measure of behavior is said to be reliable if its results are repeatable when the behaviors are remeasured

validity

a behavioral measure is said to be valid if it measures what it has been designed to measure

content validity

whether or not the actual content of the items on a test matches the content of the text

face validity

whether a measure seems to be valid to those who are taking it

criterion validity

whether a measure is meaningfully related to some other (concurrent) measure of behavior

construct validity

whether a test adequately measures some construct - directly concerned with operational definition

convergent validity

scores on a test measuring some construct should relate to scores on other tests of constructs that are theoretically related to it

Divergent/ Discriminant Validity

scores on a test measuring some construct should be unrelated to scores on other tests of constructs that are theoretically unrelated to it

nominal scales

measurement scale in which the numbers have no quantitative value, but rather serve to identify categories into which events can be placed

ordinal scale

measureent scale in which assigned numbers stand for relative standing or ranking

interval scale

measurement scale in which numbers refer to quantities, and intervals are assumed to be of equal size; a score of zero is just one of many points on the scale and does not denote the absence of the phenomenon being measured

ratio scale

mesurement scale in which numbers refer to quantities and intervals are assumed to be of equal size; a score of zero denotes the absence of the phenomenon being measured

measurement error

produced by any factor that introduces inaccuracies into the measurement of some varibale

poplation

consists of all members of some defined group

sample

some subset of the defined group (population)

descriptive statistics

summarizes the data collected from the sample of participants in your study

mean

arithmetic average of a data set, found by adding the scores and dividing by the total number of scores in the set

median

the middle score of a data set; an equal number of scores are both above and below the median

mode

the most frequently appearing score in a data set

range

in a set of scores, the difference between the score with the largest value and the one with the smallest value

standard deviation

an estimate of the average amount by which the scores in the sample distribution deviate from the mean score

variance

the number produced during the standard deviation calculation just prior to taking the square root

interquartile range

useful when there are outliers; the rang of scores between the bottom 25% of scores and the top 25% of scores

histogram

shows the number of times each score occurs or how often scores within a defined range occur

frequency distribution

a table that records the number of times that each score occurs

symmetrical distribution

normal bell-curve

stem and leaf display

used when there is such a wide range of scores that a simple frequency distribution and histogram would be cumbersome

inferenatial statistics

allows you to draw conclusions about your data that can be applied to the wider population

null hypothesis

make the assumption that there is no difference in performance between two different conditions that you are studying

alternative hypothesis

the outcome you are hoping to find

type I error

rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true

type II error

occurs when you fail to reject the null hypothesis but you are wrong

systematic variance

the result of some identifiable factor, either the variable of interest or some factor that you've failed to control adequately

error variance

nonsystematic variability due to individual differences between the subjects in the two groups and any number of random, unpredictable effects that might have occurred during the study

file-drawer effect

studies finding no differences were less likely to be published and wind up being stored away in one's files

effect size

provides an estimate of the magnitude of the difference among sets of scores, while at the same time taking into account the amount of variability in the score

meta-analysis

uses effect size analysis to combine the results from several experiments that use the same variables, even though these variables are likely to have different operational definitions

confidence interval

a range of values that is expected to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence

power

a test has high power if it results in a high probability that a difference that exists in reality will be found in a particular study