Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
6 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
3 components of status in face-to-face groups
|
prominence (attention), respect, and influence (control)
|
|
|
Findings about social status as it relates to the Big 5 and physical attractiveness
|
Big 5:
high N predicted lower status in men only; incompatible with male gender norms high E predicted higher status for M and F Physical attractiveness: increases status in men only Attractive men tend to date more women which gives them more social status among male peers |
|
|
What were the researcher’s predictions about extraversion and neuroticism regarding status?
|
they predicted that the more extraverted someone was, the more likely they were to have social status, and the more neurotic someone is, the less likely they are to have social status
|
|
|
Were these status related hypotheses supported?
|
Yes. Extraversion important for both sexes
Neuroticism in both fraternity and dorms negatively related to status; not in sorority women or dorm=> “real men are not supposed to feel and act afraid/sad/guilty/vulnerable.” |
|
|
Stability and temporal differences of social hierarchy formation in men and women
|
Status order among women takes longer to emerge and stabilize than men; but eventually men and women do not differ in stability of status hierarchies
|
|
|
Methods used in Studies...
|
studies 1 and 2: examined all-male and all female (frat/sorority), study 3: coed dorm; longitudinal design over a year.
Personality measured with NEO FFI, physical attractiveness with coders of video clips Status measured by peer ratings and life outcome (leadership positions) |
