Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
16 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Intention Manifests in Conduct |
Allan & David v Ingram |
|
|
Access does not constitute Possession |
De Beer v Zimbali |
|
|
Laws can alter requirements for Corpus and Animus |
Eastern Cape Parks v Medbury |
|
|
Proving Corpus and Animus through Action |
Jamieson v Loderf |
|
|
No possession of Public Space |
Buffalo City v ... |
|
|
Contract cannot defy the law |
Nino Bonino |
|
|
Telecommunications is a contractual right |
Xsinet |
|
|
Mandament van Spolie is not for contractual rights (water) |
Scholtz |
|
|
Water is Incidental to Possession - acknowledges Sec 27 |
Strümpher |
|
|
If an adequate alternative is provided, it doesn't constitute dispossession |
Van Rhyn |
|
|
If object destroyed, no Mandament van Spolie. If home: Constitutional Possessory Remedy |
Tswelopele |
|
|
Illegal possession can be restored through Mandament van Spolie |
Ngqukumba |
|
|
Sets out requirements for interdicts |
Setlogelo |
|
|
No Servitude allowed over a Servitude |
Brink v Van Niekerk |
|
|
Look at terms of agreement to determine what is Civiliter Modo |
Habrour's Edge |
|
|
Allow Servient owner to unilaterally alter a specific right of way |
Linvestment |
