Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
33 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
A priori
|
Without use of sense, not dependent on senses
A priori knowledge is independent of experience. |
|
A posteriori
|
reasoning or knowledge that proceeds from observations or experiences
|
|
Recollection
|
Plato's term to explain that knowledge is remembering that which we gained before we were born and lost at birth.
|
|
Rationalism
|
Knowledge is acquired by reason without resort to experience
|
|
Empiricism
|
the doctrine that knowledge derives from experience
|
|
Tabula Rasa
|
"Blank Slate" used by John Locke
the theory that the (human) mind is at birth a "blank slate" without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one's sensory experiences. |
|
Innate knowledge
|
Knowledge present in the brain, innate is a form of immediate knowledge
|
|
Immediate knowledge
|
Any knowledge that is not mediated by your senses
|
|
Mediate knowledge
|
Knowledge brought about through an intervening sense
|
|
Epistemology
|
The theory of knowledge; how do we know what we think we know?
|
|
Inductive logic/reasoning
|
Making a generalization from information about specific situations, focused on concluding probability based on observation or experience.
moving from the specific to the general. |
|
Deductive logic/reasoning
|
Logical reasoning within a philosophical system.
Its medium is the syllogism. begins with the general and ends with the specific. |
|
Primary qualities (Locke)
|
Those that force themselves upon us.
Primary qualities are properties objects have that are independent of any observer, such as solidity, extension, motion, number and figure. These characteristics convey facts. |
|
Secondary qualities (Locke)
|
Those which we influence.
Secondary qualities properties subject to sensations in observers Knowledge that comes from secondary qualities does not provide objective facts about things. |
|
Egocentric Predicament
|
We are locked within our own senses. We can't directly confront reality.
|
|
What is the problem of certainty? Why is it only a problem for empiricists?
|
No problem for rationalists because they have a closed system. It's a problem for empiricists because they can't conclusively come to a universal because knowledge is limited by mediation. (our senses).
|
|
Positivists
|
The only meaningful philosophical problems are those that can be solved by logical analysis. You can't make a sentence that has meaning unless you're referencing that which exists.
Positivism is the view that the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge, and that such knowledge can only come from positive affirmation of theories through strict scientific method. The term "positive" used in the epistemological sense means literally "value free" -- that is, positivism seeks objective truth not subject to interpretation. |
|
Allegory of the cave
|
Plato's way of explaining what knowledge is, where it comes from:
We are in a cave We can't turn our head around Outside the opening of the cave are forms What we see is the shadows of the forms We experience forms |
|
Receptivity
|
A source of religious knowledge.
the power to receive the Divine Force and to feel its presence and allow it to work, guiding one's sight and will and action; the capacity of admitting and retaining the divine workings |
|
Authority
|
A source of religious knowledge.
An individual or group of individuals who provide their adherents with spiritual and moral models, and who believe can bring highly positive influences both to adherents and society in general. |
|
Direct communication
|
A source of religious knowledge.
Divine communication with no one or nothing in between |
|
What are the three religious sources?
|
RAD
Receptivity, Authority, Direction Communication |
|
Cogito Ergo Sum
|
I think, therefore I am
descartes, his philosophical starting point. |
|
The problem of certainty?
|
The problem of reconciling your philosophical conception of the world with how it relates to what we know, and how it is that we know it. Certainty is the apex of epistemology.
|
|
Plato is ____ because he thinks we have ___ ____.
|
rationalist
innate knowledge |
|
How do we gain knowledge through Plato's philosophy?
|
Platonic epistemology holds that knowledge is innateso when something is learned, according to Plato it is actually recalled.
The information we get by relying on sense experience is constantly changing and is often unreliable. It can be corrected and evaluated for dependability only be appealing to principles that themselves do not change. These unchanging principles (or "Forms") are the bases of what it means to think or reason in the first place. |
|
How does Plato solve the problem of certainty?
|
Certainty of knowledge derives from the world of timeless forms. Certainy is thus what can be concluded from principles that cannot be any other way. We gain knowledge through recollection, and we test that knowledge through principles that do not change.
|
|
How do we gain knowledge through Descartes?
|
Descartes concluded: "Cogito ergo sum," I think, therefore I exist. From this starting point I can begin to note other truths that I know clearly and distinctly, such as the principle of identity (A is A) and the notion that things in the world are "substances." Since identity and substance are ideas that are not based on sensation, they must be innate (that is, they must be implicit in the very act of thinking itself). Even sensible things (e.g., a block of wax) are knowable not based on sense experience but intellectually, insofar as we know them to be the same things even though their sensible appearances might change dramatically.
In order to prove that certainy is possible, Descartes claims that it is possible because God would not permit us to be fooled by malevolent being (and God can't be malevolent according to Descartes, because God is perfect, which coincidentally is exactly the evidence Descartes depends on for God's existence in the first place.) |
|
How does Descartes answer the problem of certainty?
|
In order to determine whether there is anything we can know with certainty, Descartes says that we first have to doubt everything we know. In order to see if there is some belief that cannot be doubted, we should temporarily suspend everything, so that everything we know is questionable. From here we can build reality back up, starting from our very inability to doubt our own existence, as the action of doubting itself proves we exist. Cogito ergo sum!
Descartes goes on to produce a criterion for truths which we can know for absolute certainty. He does this by reflecting on those truths which he has already discovered using the method of doubt, and determines that what they all have in common is that the ideas in them are all clear and distinct. Thus any truth composed of clear and distinct ideas can be known for certain. |
|
How does John Locke solve the problem of certainty?
|
In Locke's work, "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding" he says explicitly in his thesis,0
"The aim thus is not to achieve certainty, but to understand how much weight we can assign to different types of knowledge." "experience: in that, all our knowledge is founded; and from that it ultimately derives itself." |
|
How do we gain knowledge through John Locke?
|
We gain knowledge through "experience: in that, all our knowledge is founded; and from that it ultimately derives itself."
His understanding of the human mind is that of the blank slate that starts empty, and is occupied by experience. |
|
John Locke is an ______.
|
Empiricist
|
|
Positivism
|
the form of empiricism that bases all knowledge on perceptual experience (not on intuition or revelation)
All meaningful statements can be proven through science or a a mathematical proof, otherwise it's nonsense. emphasizes observable facts and excludes metaphysical speculation about origins or ultimate causes |