• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Stace I. 1. Why can there be no morality without free will?
If 'it' has to happen, there is no point in morality
Stace I. 2. What point does Stace make with his hypothetical example of a dispute about whether human beings exist?
It depends on how you define something
-You could say human beings are five-legged creatures
-According to Stace, the definition of free will is wrong
Stace II. 1. What is the incorrect definition of free acts that has led philosophers to conclude that determinism is inconsistent with free will?
Incorrect def: Free acts have no cause
Stace II. 2. What is the proper criterion for determining whether a definition is correct?
common usage- how the word is used by most people, and what the ordinary person thinks it means
Stace II. 3. What feature is present in Stace’s examples of acts that are called free, but absent from his examples of acts that are called unfree?
Desire, motives, or internal psychological states of mind
Stace II. 4. What is Stace’s definition of a free act? of an unfree act?
Free- from internal causes/psychological states of the agent
Unfree- causes external from the agent
Stace II. 5. Why is free will compatible with determinism?
-Free will is from an internal cause
-Determinism has a cause, and had to happen

COMPATIBILISM- Free will + determinism
Stace III. 1. What is Stace’s answer to the objection that some actions do not fit neatly into his “free” and “unfree” categories?
Borderline cases still have a distinction based upon the definition of free acts

E.g. Giving a wallet to someone with a gun to your head...no force was used, so the act was compulsory (free)
Stace III. 2. What is Stace’s answer to the objection that free will is incompatible with predictability?
A prediction does not influence an internal cause
-Just because you predicted a person to vote Republican doesn't mean it influenced them to
Stace IV. 1. What are the two legitimate justifications for administering punishment? How is determinism compatible with each one?
a. correcting character- assuming it will correct behavior (assuming a cause and effect)

b. deterring others- scaring other by capital punishment will have the effect of scaring others from committing the crime (cause and effect again)
Stace IV. 2. Why would moral responsibility disappear without determinism?
Free will requires an internal cause, and without moral responsibility, actions would be uncaused/unpredictable