• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Holmstrom I. 1. According to soft determinism, when is an action free? When is it not free?
Free- from an internal cause
Not free- external cause
Holmstrom I. 2. Why is the standard soft determinist account of free acts inadequate?
Some source could influence your allegedly 'free' actions, even though the cause is internal
Holmstrom I. 3. For Holmstrom, what does it mean to have control over something?
I must be a significant part of the causal process, and aware that I am a part of it
Holmstrom I. 4. How does Holmstrom describe free acts in terms of a continuum?
Continuum: a spectrum of free and unfree
Control is based on a degree of "how free" it is.
Free|------------X---------|Unfree
Holmstrom I 5. What is the major purpose of Holmstrom’s paper?
People can have differing amounts of control over what they desire or believe
Holmstrom II. 1. Why is it consistent for soft determinism to hold that the actions of a heroin addict are unfree, even though they come from the addict’s beliefs and desires?
You need to be in control as a whole person
-integrated set of beliefs and desires
-must be no internal conflict (heroin: want, but do not want)
Holmstrom VI. 1. What objection does Holmstrom raise against her contention that we have control over some of our actions?
You need to have control over internal desires
"all internal desires" is too broad
You must have control over all preceding events,which is impossible; you cannot have control over what happened at the Big Bang
Holmstrom VI. 2. Why does it not make sense to look for something other than myself that controls my integrated set of beliefs and desires?
It is free if it comes from an integrated set of beliefs and desires=whole self

If it happened before your integrated set (your whole self) it is irrelevant
Holmstrom VI 3. At what point does a series of higher order volitions (second order desire, third order desire, and so on) come to an end?
To be free, you need to want to want something...wanting to want to want to want to want something is irrelevant