• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Patel, Wilson, Dawood, Mannocci. IEJ 2012 (Part 1)

More PA lesions were detected by CBCT compared to 2D images. periapical lesions were present in 20% roots with periapical radiographs and 48% with CBCT. Seventy-five additional roots were detected with CBCT.




+151 teeth (273 roots), preop status, pt 1 of 2


-no gold standard (histo)

Patel, Wilson, Dawood, Foschi, Mannocci. IEJ 2012 (Part 2)

The 'healed' rate was 87% using PA and 62.5% using CBCT (P<0.001). This increased to 95.1% and 84.7%, respectively, when the 'healing' group was included (P<0.002). There was a 14 times increase in failure rate when teeth with no pre-op PARL were assessed with CBCT compared with PA at 1year.




+123 teeth, 1 yr f/u

Petersson, Axelsson, Davidson, Frisk, Hakeberg, Kvist, Norlund, Mejàre, Portenier, Sandberg, Tranaeus, Bergenholtz. IEJ 2012

There is insufficient evidence that the digital intraoral radiographic technique is diagnostically as accurate as the conventional film technique. The same applies to CBCT.




Sys Rev/

Kruse, Spin-Neto, Wenzel, Kirkevang. IEJ 2015

There is a tendency for a higher accuracy for periapical lesion detection using CBCT compared to two-dimensional imaging methods.




Sys Rev/

Estrela, Bueno, Leles, Azevedo, Azevedo. JOE 2008

the prevalence of AP was significantly higher with CBCT, in comparison to periapical and panoramic radiographs (63.3% vs 35.3% vs 17.6% in RCTed teeth and 74.7% vs 36.1% vs 21.7% in non RCTed teeth).




+1508 teeth, clinical study