• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Banford v Turnley

Give and take ,.....live and let live

Malone v Laskey

should have legal interest - Sure shall have legal interest

Hunter v Canary Wharf

Mobile phone signal is not required for reasonable enjoyment of land

Leakey v National Trust

Occupier of the land can be sued - tenant

Thomas v NUM

Creator of nuisance - the

Sedleigh Denfield v O' Callaghan

If the trespasser has laid a pipe and you have adopted it (not opposed) You can be sued for the nuisance created bcoz of it

Tetley v Chitty

Landlord held liable for tenant'a negligence

Mitchell v Darly Main Colliery

Loss in N - property damage

Walter v Selfe

Loss in N - Sensory Personal Discomfort

Hunter v Canary Wharf

loss in N- You can cover personal injury

Dalton v Angus 1881

Loss of N - can't cover the loss of view

Bridlington Relay v Yorkshire Electricity Board 1965

Can cover the television signal loss

Cambridge water v Eastern Counties Leather

Loss of N- shall be foreseeable

Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co

Loss of N- direct interference

Harrison v Southwark and Vauxhall Water 1891

Not one off event ( short period of time)- highways work created issue.

Robinson v Kilvert 1889

No liability - abnormal sensitivity damage the paper - No claim

McKinnon v Walker 1951

No claim - high sensitivity plants got damage

Christie v Davey 1893

Malice - piano teacher creating N - Claim successe

Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett 1936

Claim successful - Fox on the land

Sturger v Bridgman

The sugar factory creating noice in doctor waiting area. The location of the facility and the use of the land in that area.

Adams v Ursell 1913

Adams was unhappy with the smell of butter and it was a commercial area good for chip shop

Laws v Florin place 1981

The Sex Shop - in the residential area where there are child . Question of Fact & Dregee

Coventry v Lawrence 2014

Planning commission - will not excuse you to crated N caused. Race course and sound create

Watson v Craft Promo Sport 2009

If the facility is used for the public purpose it imp on policy ground

Coventry v Lawrence 2014

N Defense - Prescription- You can't complain of N if you have accepted it for last 20 years

Allen v Gulf Oil 1981

Defence - Statutory Authority-the activity is mentioned in the law

Leakey v National Trust 1980

D - Act of God

Sedleigh-Denfield v O' Callaghan 1940

Defence - Act of Trespasser -

Miller v Jackson 1977

Defence in N - Consent

Trevett v Lee 1955

Defence of N- contributory negligence

Miller v Jackson

Remedies - Injunction

Watson v Craft Promo - Sport 2009

Remedies - Kennaway v Thompson

Dobson v Thames Water 2009

Remedies - Damages