Nebosh Diploma Unit A

Front 1

MHSWR 1999 regulation 3

Back 1

Requirement for suitable and sufficient risk assessment

Front 2

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 4

Back 2

Principles of prevention to be aimed

Front 3

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 5

Back 3

Health and safety arrangements

Front 4

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 6

Back 4

Health surveillance

Front 5

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 7

Back 5

Health and safety assistance

Front 6

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 8

Back 6

Procedures for serious and imminent danger and for danger areas

Front 7

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 9

Back 7

Contacts with external services

Front 8

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 10

Back 8

Information for employees

Front 9

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 11

Back 9

Cooperation and coordination

Front 10

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 12

Back 10

Persons working in host employers or self employed persons undertakings

Front 11

MHSWR 1999 Regulation 13

Back 11

Capabilities and training

Training must be:

Repeated periodically where appropriate

Be adapted to new or changed risks

Take place during worthing hours

Front 12

MHSWR 1999 regulation 14

Back 12

Employee's duties

Follow health and safety instructions by using machinery substances etc in accordance with the instruction and training they have received.

Inform employer of dangers and shortcomings in h&s arrangements

Front 13

MHSWR 1999 regulation 15

Back 13

Temporary workers

Front 14

MHSWR 1999 regulation 16

Back 14

Risk standby in respect of new or expectant mothers

Front 15

MHSWR 1999 regulation 17

Back 15

Certification fein registers medical practitioner in respect of new or expectant mothers

Front 16

MHSWR 1999 regulation 18

Back 16

Notification by new or expectant mothers

Front 17

MHSWR 1999 regulation 19

Back 17

Protection of young persons

Front 18

MHSWR 1999 regulation 20

Back 18

Exemption certificates

Front 19

MHSWR 1999 regulation 21

Back 19

Provisions as to liability

Front 20

MHSWR 1999 regulation 22

Back 20

Exclusion of civil liability

Front 21

MHSWR 1999 regulation 23

Back 21

Extension outside great Britain

Front 22

MHSWR 1999 regulation 24

Back 22

Amendment of the health and safety first aid regulations 1981

Front 23

MHSWR 1999 regulation 25

Back 23

Amendment of the offshore installations and pipeline world (first aid) regulations 1989

Front 24

MHSWR 1999 regulation 26

Back 24

Amendment of the mines miscellaneous health and safety provisions regulation 1995

Front 25

MHSWR 1999 regulation 27

Back 25

Amendment of the construction (health, safety and slate) regulations 1996

Front 26

MHSWR 1999 regulation 28

Back 26

Regulations to have effect as health and safety regulations

Front 27

MHSWR 1999 regulation 29

Back 27

Revocations and consequential amendments

Front 28

MHSWR 1999 regulation 30

Back 28

Transitional provision

Front 29

John summers and sons vs frost

Back 29

Definition of absolute duty.

Grinding wheel unguarded. Judge determined must be guarded even if it renders the equipment unusable as stated "absolute"

Front 30

Adsett vs k&l steelfounders

Back 30

Definition of practicable.

Pneumoconiosis - no dust extraction available at the time

Front 31

Marshall v Gotham and co

Back 31

Practicable vs reasonably practicable

Roof collapse in mine. No technology to determine the fault at the time

Front 32

Edwards vs national coal board

Back 32

Reasonably practicable

Wall collapsed due to lack of shoring. Determined that where a life is at stake them more care must be taken

Front 33

Bradford vs Robinsons rentals ltd

Back 33

Employers duty to provide necessary equipment

Driver in cold weather and no heating in van. Employers told him to make journey anyway.

Front 34

Caparo industries plc vs Dickman

Back 34

Duty of care in negligence

Fidelity plc takeover by caparo. Dickman falsified accounts. Accounts not intended for external use. Dickman won

Front 35

Corn vs Weirs glass

Back 35

Breach of statutory duty

Successful claim requires the loss to be from the breach of statute

Glazier carrying glass fell on a stairway. Sued because no handrail

Front 36

Davie vs new Merton board mills 1958

Back 36

Liability from defective tools lay with manufacturer before this ruling

Changed by employers liability defective equipment act 1969 placed the liability on the employer