• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

At this point in the meditations


what has been doubted or not


Beg of Med 5

-The nature of existence of the mind has never been doubted- mind has never been doubted


-doubted and recovered: God and god's existence and nature (infinite, perfect- recovered in 4th meditation)


-Gods existence recovered in 3rd meditation



Things still in doubt:

- the nature and existence of the external world including one's own body


- don't know whether material things exist and what they are really like


-ORDER he does it in is weird- in med 5 he argues the essence of matter- the nature and what is like but won't argue the existence until med 6


- in med 5 NOTHING to do with the existence of the real- just proves the essence or what it's really like


- math also still in doubt- recovers mathematical truth in med 5

cont'd

- he now has the method for recovering truth and knowledge though - the TC has been proved and is now guaranteed


- he can affirm anything as true so long as it is a c&d perception

1. Essence of matter (nature) - what it's really like

-He did this before when looking at the wax- but didn't have the TC back then and he inspected the wax with his senses


-He begins with the conceptual idea of body/ matter not through senses


- what is c&d about the idea of body? conceptually, what is body unto itself. What do you C&d perceive about that idea

cont'd


pg 87 bottom (LBD)

- he c&d perceives that body in general has the nature of extension- LENGTH, BREADTH AND DEPTH


- that is the nature of matter- the extension of matter


- it is by very nature an extension- body/matter is L,B,D. wherever there is that there is body


- wherever there is space there is body. That is the essence of matter


- modes of matter: sizes, shapes, positions

2. Innate Ideas of Essences

- Contemplation of extension and his modes


- C&D knowledge of other things namely geometry and arithmetic


-he has ideas of shapes- shapes may or may not exist outside of him that's still in doubt BUT


- shapes have their own unchangeable immutable natures- what it is to be a circle or a triangle


- he realizes that he c&d perceives that certain properties necessarily belong to those natures

Eg idea of a triangle

- Eternal nature of a triangle- i have an idea of the immutable and eternal nature of a triangle


- i c&d perceive that it belongs to the idea that the interior angles= 2 right angles


- whats the source of that idea

The source of that idea?

A) source not through the senses- reason that w can have c&d ideas of shapes we have never sensed


B) not arrived at through the imagination: we don't willingly invent these ideas and we can't change them. They're determinant immutable and eternal


- leaves us with innate ideas- the source must be innate ideas


- we recognize them as c&d we must assent to them, we're not indifferent to affirming these truths

Cont'd

- draws conclusion that innate ideas are the essence of things and their properties must be true


- this realization sets Descartes up for the 3rd argument for the existence of God



3. third argument for the existence of God: God's essence


Ontological argument- Ontology: the study of being

- argument from the being/ essence of God


- pg 88 section 65- C&D idea of God as a supreme and perfect being


A) i have an idea of the immutable and eternal nature of God


B) I perceive that it belongs to that idea that God exists necessarily belongs to that idea. Therefore God exists.

Ontological argument

i have an idea of God, a supremely perfect being




I clearly and distinctly perceive that the existence necessarily belongs to that idea




therefore God exists

Objection 1

zz

Objection 2

zz